• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

AJCC 分期系统第七版与第八版预测甲状腺微小乳头状癌复发的比较。

A Comparison of the Seventh and Eighth Editions of the AJCC Staging Systems to Predict Recurrence in Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

Department of Hernia, Hangzhou Xiaoshan First People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;28(11):6564-6571. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09596-6. Epub 2021 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-021-09596-6
PMID:33521903
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The incidence of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma has been constantly rising in recent decades. The tumor, node, metastasis staging system is designed to predict prognosis in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. Recent studies have shown that the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition is superior to the 7th edition for predicting tumor recurrence in PTC patients. To date, whether the 8th edition is also better able to predict recurrence in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) remains unclear.

METHOD

We enrolled 1007 cases from our thyroid cancer database in the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, from 1997 to 2011. Univariable and multivariate Cox hazard regression analyses were used to identify the association between variables and recurrence. Disease-free survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

A total of 1007 PTMC patients were enrolled, with a median follow-up of 67 months. Of 93 (9.2%) patients downstaged by the changes in versions, 49 (52.7%) were downstaged because the age-at-diagnosis cut-off used for staging increased from 45 to 55 years, while 35 (37.6%) were downstaged due to the weakening of the effects of lymph node metastasis. The recurrence rate of PTMC was 4.17%. Univariate Cox hazards regression analyses showed that TNM stage according to the AJCC 8th edition was significantly associated with recurrence, while the recurrence survival curves showed that TNM stage (stage I vs. stage II-IV) according to the AJCC 8th edition, but not the 7th edition, was significantly associated with disease-free survival (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The AJCC 8th edition has better ability to predict recurrence in PTMC patients than the 7th edition.

摘要

背景

近年来,甲状腺微小乳头状癌的发病率不断上升。肿瘤、淋巴结、远处转移分期系统旨在预测甲状腺乳头状癌患者的预后。最近的研究表明,美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第 8 版在预测 PTC 患者肿瘤复发方面优于第 7 版。迄今为止,第 8 版是否也能更好地预测甲状腺微小乳头状癌(PTMC)的复发仍不清楚。

方法

我们从浙江大学医学院附属第一医院的甲状腺癌数据库中招募了 1007 例患者,时间范围为 1997 年至 2011 年。采用单变量和多变量 Cox 风险回归分析来确定变量与复发之间的关系。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法计算无病生存率,并使用对数秩检验进行比较。

结果

共纳入 1007 例 PTMC 患者,中位随访时间为 67 个月。在版本变化中降级的 93 例(9.2%)患者中,49 例(52.7%)因分期使用的诊断时年龄截止值从 45 岁增加到 55 岁而降级,而 35 例(37.6%)因淋巴结转移影响减弱而降级。PTMC 的复发率为 4.17%。单变量 Cox 风险回归分析显示,根据 AJCC 第 8 版的 TNM 分期与复发显著相关,而复发生存曲线显示,根据 AJCC 第 8 版(Ⅰ期与Ⅱ-Ⅳ期)的 TNM 分期与无病生存率显著相关,但根据第 7 版则不然(p<0.05)。

结论

与第 7 版相比,AJCC 第 8 版在预测 PTMC 患者的复发方面具有更好的能力。

相似文献

1
A Comparison of the Seventh and Eighth Editions of the AJCC Staging Systems to Predict Recurrence in Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma.AJCC 分期系统第七版与第八版预测甲状腺微小乳头状癌复发的比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;28(11):6564-6571. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09596-6. Epub 2021 Jan 31.
2
A comparison of the 7th and 8th editions of the AJCC staging system in terms of predicting recurrence and survival in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma.第 7 版和第 8 版 AJCC 分期系统在预测甲状腺乳头状癌患者复发和生存方面的比较。
Oral Oncol. 2018 Dec;87:158-164. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
3
Survival in Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: A Comparative Analysis Between the 7th and 8th Versions of the AJCC/UICC Staging System Based on the SEER Database.甲状腺微小乳头状癌的生存情况:基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库对美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)/国际抗癌联盟(UICC)第7版和第8版分期系统的比较分析
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Jan 24;10:10. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00010. eCollection 2019.
4
Projecting Survival in Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Comparison of the Seventh and Eighth Editions of the American Joint Commission on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control Staging Systems in Two Contemporary National Patient Cohorts.预测甲状腺乳头状癌患者的生存情况:在两个当代国家患者队列中比较第七版和第八版美国癌症联合委员会/国际癌症控制联合会分期系统。
Thyroid. 2017 Nov;27(11):1408-1416. doi: 10.1089/thy.2017.0306. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
5
Comparing the Prognostic Value of the Eighth Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Tumor Node Metastasis Staging System Between Papillary and Follicular Thyroid Cancer.比较第八版美国癌症联合委员会/肿瘤淋巴结转移分期系统在甲状腺乳头状癌和滤泡状癌中的预后价值。
Thyroid. 2018 Aug;28(8):976-981. doi: 10.1089/thy.2018.0066. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
6
Predicting recurrence of papillary thyroid cancer using the eighth edition of the AJCC/UICC staging system.使用第八版 AJCC/UICC 分期系统预测甲状腺乳头状癌的复发。
Br J Surg. 2019 Jun;106(7):889-897. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11145. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
7
Risk of Recurrence in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Population-Based Comparison of the 7th and 8th Editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Systems.分化型甲状腺癌的复发风险:第 7 版和第 8 版美国癌症联合委员会分期系统的人群比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;26(9):2703-2710. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07275-1. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
8
Survival in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Comparing the AJCC Cancer Staging Seventh and Eighth Editions.分化型甲状腺癌的生存:比较 AJCC 癌症分期第七版和第八版。
Thyroid. 2018 Oct;28(10):1301-1310. doi: 10.1089/thy.2017.0572.
9
Comparison of long-term prognosis for differentiated thyroid cancer according to the 7th and 8th editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system.根据美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)/国际抗癌联盟(UICC)第7版和第8版TNM分期系统对分化型甲状腺癌长期预后的比较。
Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2020 May 19;11:2042018820921019. doi: 10.1177/2042018820921019. eCollection 2020.
10
The impact of radioactive iodine treatment on survival among papillary thyroid cancer patients according to the 7th and 8th editions of the AJCC/TNM staging system: a SEER-based study.基于 SEER 数据库的研究:第 7 版和第 8 版 AJCC/TNM 分期系统中放射性碘治疗对甲状腺乳头状癌患者生存的影响。
Updates Surg. 2020 Sep;72(3):871-884. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00773-y. Epub 2020 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of an explainable machine learning model to predict Delphian lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid cancer: a large cohort study.用于预测甲状腺乳头状癌中德尔菲淋巴结转移的可解释机器学习模型的开发与验证:一项大型队列研究
J Cancer. 2025 Mar 3;16(6):2041-2061. doi: 10.7150/jca.110141. eCollection 2025.
2
Lateral lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a study of 5241 follow-up patients.甲状腺微小乳头状癌侧颈部淋巴结转移:5241 例随访患者研究。
Endocrine. 2024 Feb;83(2):414-421. doi: 10.1007/s12020-023-03486-5. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
3
An Integrative Multi-Omics Analysis of The Molecular Links between Aging and Aggressiveness in Thyroid Cancers.

本文引用的文献

1
The analysis of clinicopathologic predictors of lymph node metastasis and postoperative recurrence in patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma from Guangdong Province, China-a multicenter retrospective study.中国广东省甲状腺微小乳头状癌患者淋巴结转移及术后复发的临床病理预测因素分析——一项多中心回顾性研究
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2017 Sep 1;10(9):9735-9743. eCollection 2017.
2
Long-Term Recurrence of Small Papillary Thyroid Cancer and Its Risk Factors in a Korean Multicenter Study.韩国多中心研究中甲状腺微小乳头状癌的长期复发及其危险因素
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Feb 1;102(2):625-633. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-2287.
3
甲状腺癌中衰老与侵袭性之间分子联系的综合多组学分析
Aging Dis. 2023 Jun 1;14(3):992-1012. doi: 10.14336/AD.2022.1021.
4
Nomogram Predicts Overall Survival in Patients With Stage IV Thyroid Cancer (TC): A Population-Based Analysis From the SEER Database.列线图预测IV期甲状腺癌(TC)患者的总生存期:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的人群分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 11;12:919740. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.919740. eCollection 2022.
Lymph node metastasis from 259 papillary thyroid microcarcinomas: frequency, pattern of occurrence and recurrence, and optimal strategy for neck dissection.
259例甲状腺微小乳头状癌的淋巴结转移:发生率、发生及复发模式以及颈部清扫的最佳策略
Ann Surg. 2003 Mar;237(3):399-407. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000055273.58908.19.