Center for Health Research, Helse Førde, Førde, Norway.
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Psychother Res. 2021 Feb;31(2):142-144. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2020.1866786.
The practice of routine outcome monitoring and providing clinical feedback has been widely studied within psychotherapy. Nevertheless, there are many outstanding questions regarding this practice. Is it an evidence-based adjunct to ongoing psychotherapies, or an ineffective complication of treatment? If it is effective, through what mechanism(s) does it act? Is it effective with all patient populations, treatment types, and service delivery mechanisms, or does its impact vary across context? What choices in the implementation process affect the utility of patient-reported data feedback on psychotherapy outcomes? The studies in this special section explore these questions using a wide variety of methods and significantly expand the reach of studies on feedback. Together, these studies represent a snapshot of a maturing field of study: Initial discoveries are developed into more robust theories and applied in a wider range of contexts, while the limits of that theory are tested. They also signal directions for future clinical and research work that may improve patient care in psychosocial interventions into the future.
在心理治疗中,常规结果监测和提供临床反馈的做法已经得到了广泛的研究。然而,关于这种做法仍有许多悬而未决的问题。它是对正在进行的心理治疗的一种基于证据的辅助手段,还是治疗无效的复杂化?如果它是有效的,它通过什么机制起作用?它对所有患者群体、治疗类型和服务提供机制都有效,还是其影响因环境而异?实施过程中的哪些选择会影响心理治疗结果的患者报告数据反馈的效用?本特刊中的研究使用各种方法探讨了这些问题,极大地扩展了关于反馈的研究范围。这些研究共同代表了一个成熟研究领域的一个瞬间:初始发现被发展成更强大的理论,并在更广泛的背景下应用,同时该理论的局限性也在被检验。它们还为未来的临床和研究工作指明了方向,这些工作可能会在未来改善心理社会干预的患者护理。