Fonyakin A V, Geraskina L A
Research Center of Neurology, Moscow.
Kardiologiia. 2021 Jan 19;60(12):97-103. doi: 10.18087/cardio.2020.12.n1032.
This article presents current opinions on the role of antithrombotic therapy in secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in patients after noncardioembolic stroke or a transient ischemic attack on the background of sinus rhythm. This review analytically analyses evidence-based data on antithrombotic drugs used for this secondary prevention. Despite the fact that acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is still a "gold standard" for prevention of noncardioembolic stroke, the search for rational combinations of antithrombotic drugs to increase the effectiveness of preventive treatment is relevant. The question whether the rivaroxaban treatment as monotherapy or in combination with ASA is more effective than the ASA monotherapy for secondary prevention of cardiovascular complications (CVC) was addressed in the COMPASS study. In that study, three regimens of antithrombotic therapy were compared in patients with stable atherosclerotic CVD: rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice a day) in combination with ASA (100 mg/day); rivaroxaban (5 mg twice a day); and ASA (100 mg/day). Risk for development of major CVC (death, stroke, myocardial infarction (IM)) was lower (p<0.001) in the rivaroxaban+ASA combination treatment group than in the ASA monotherapy group; however, the risk of major bleedings was somewhat higher. Total risk based on the definition of "pure clinical benefit" was lower for the rivaroxaban+ASA combination treatment than for the ASA monotherapy. The rivaroxaban monotherapy did not result in a significant decrease in the risk of major CVC compared to the ASA monotherapy but significantly increased the risk of major bleedings. Incidence of repeated ischemic stroke for a year was 1.1% for the combination therapy, 2.6% for the rivaroxaban therapy, and 3.4% for the ASA monotherapy with significant differences between the combination treatment group and the ASA monotherapy group (p<0.01). Relative risk of repeated stroke was 67% lower for the combination therapy group compared to the ASA monotherapy group. The combination of rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice a day) and ASA (100 mg) opens a new epoch of antithrombotic treatment for primary and secondary prevention of stroke in patients with a stable atherosclerotic CVD and sinus rhythm.
本文介绍了关于抗血栓治疗在窦性心律背景下非心源性卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作患者心血管疾病(CVD)二级预防中作用的当前观点。本综述分析了用于这种二级预防的抗血栓药物的循证数据。尽管乙酰水杨酸(ASA)仍然是预防非心源性卒中的“金标准”,但寻找合理的抗血栓药物组合以提高预防治疗的有效性仍然具有重要意义。COMPASS研究探讨了利伐沙班单药治疗或与ASA联合治疗在心血管并发症(CVC)二级预防方面是否比ASA单药治疗更有效。在该研究中,对稳定型动脉粥样硬化性CVD患者的三种抗血栓治疗方案进行了比较:利伐沙班(每日两次,每次2.5mg)联合ASA(每日100mg);利伐沙班(每日两次,每次5mg);以及ASA(每日100mg)。利伐沙班+ASA联合治疗组发生主要CVC(死亡、卒中、心肌梗死(IM))的风险低于ASA单药治疗组(p<0.001);然而,主要出血风险略高。基于“纯临床获益”定义的总体风险,利伐沙班+ASA联合治疗低于ASA单药治疗。与ASA单药治疗相比,利伐沙班单药治疗并未显著降低主要CVC的风险,但显著增加了主要出血的风险。联合治疗组一年期反复缺血性卒中的发生率为1.1%,利伐沙班治疗组为2.6%,ASA单药治疗组为3.4%,联合治疗组与ASA单药治疗组之间存在显著差异(p<0.01)。联合治疗组反复卒中的相对风险比ASA单药治疗组低67%。利伐沙班(每日两次,每次2.5mg)与ASA(100mg)的联合应用为稳定型动脉粥样硬化性CVD和窦性心律患者的卒中一级和二级预防开启了抗血栓治疗的新纪元。