Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ann Behav Med. 2021 Oct 4;55(10):994-1004. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaa122.
Comorbid disease in cancer patients can substantially impact medical care, emotional distress, and mortality. However, there is a paucity of research on how coping may affect the relationship between comorbidity and emotional distress.
The current study investigated whether the relations between comorbidity and emotional distress and between functional impairment and emotional distress were mediated by three types of coping: action planning (AP), support/advice seeking (SAS), and disengagement (DD).
Four hundred and eighty-three persons with cancer completed a measure of functional impairment (Sickness Impact Profile), the Checklist of Comorbid Conditions, the Brief COPE, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Quality of Life Assessment for Cancer Survivors (Negative Feelings Scale), and the Distress Screening Schedule (Emotional Distress Scale). The latter three measures were used to form a latent construct representing the outcome, emotional distress.
Model comparison analysis indicated that the model with DD as a mediator had a better fit than models containing AP and SAS. DD mediated the relationship between functional impairment and emotional distress, so that engaging in DD was associated with greater distress. In addition, comorbidity and functional impairment were directly and positively related to emotional distress, but the relation between comorbidity and distress was not mediated by coping type.
Both comorbidity and functional impairment may be associated with distress, but disengagement coping only mediated the relation involving functional impairment and was positively associated with distress. Future studies can investigate whether teaching active coping or adaptive coping (e.g., through mindfulness exercises) can decrease distress in cancer patients, despite functional impairments.
癌症患者的合并症会对医疗护理、情绪困扰和死亡率产生重大影响。然而,关于应对方式如何影响合并症与情绪困扰之间的关系的研究却很少。
本研究调查了应对方式的三种类型(行动计划、寻求支持/建议和回避)是否在合并症与情绪困扰以及功能障碍与情绪困扰之间的关系中起中介作用。
483 名癌症患者完成了功能障碍量表(Sickness Impact Profile)、合并症检查表、Brief COPE、医院焦虑抑郁量表、癌症幸存者生活质量评估(负面感受量表)和痛苦筛查量表(情绪困扰量表)。后三个量表用于形成一个代表结果的潜在结构,即情绪困扰。
模型比较分析表明,包含回避作为中介的模型拟合度优于包含行动计划和寻求支持/建议的模型。回避中介了功能障碍与情绪困扰之间的关系,因此回避与更大的困扰有关。此外,合并症和功能障碍与情绪困扰直接呈正相关,但合并症与困扰之间的关系不受应对方式类型的中介。
合并症和功能障碍都可能与困扰有关,但回避应对仅中介了涉及功能障碍的关系,并与困扰呈正相关。未来的研究可以调查,尽管存在功能障碍,教授积极应对或适应性应对(例如,通过正念练习)是否可以减轻癌症患者的困扰。