COVID-19 task force of the Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France.
Department of Human Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, School of Medicine, Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Oct;278(10):4101-4105. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06624-9. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
The rapid spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 and the implementation of quarantine in many European countries led to a swift change in health care delivery. Telemedicine was implemented in many otolaryngological departments to ensure the continuous care. The purpose of this study is to report our experience about telemedicine in 86 patients consulting virtually in our departments.
A total of 86 patients benefited from telemedicine consultation from April to Mai May 2020. Patients and physicians were invited to fulfill a satisfaction survey over the 3 days after the consultation.
Patients consulted in the following fields: laryngology, voice and swallowing (N=15; 17.4%), head and neck or plastic surgery (N=34; 39.5%), rhinology (N=31; 36.1%) and otology (N=6; 7.0%). Practitioners estimated that the clinical examination would not have changed the consultation issue in 73.2% of cases. The realization of delayed clinical examination was rapidly necessary in 9.3% of cases and useless in 33.7% of cases. Five percent of patients estimated that the consultation did not bring reliable conclusion. Although the majority of patient (87.7%) would recommend telemedicine consultation to friend/family in the context of pandemic, only 44.6% would accept to replace office- consultation by telemedicine consultation outside the pandemic.
Telemedicine appears to be an interesting alternative approach in situation of pandemic and lock-down. Because the patient motivation to further participate to telemedicine appears to be conditioned by the context, efforts are still required to understand the patient perception, satisfaction and fears in view of future implementation outside pandemic.
2019 年冠状病毒病的迅速传播以及许多欧洲国家的隔离措施导致医疗服务迅速改变。许多耳鼻喉科部门实施了远程医疗,以确保连续护理。本研究的目的是报告我们在虚拟咨询的 86 名患者在我们部门的远程医疗经验。
共有 86 名患者在 2020 年 4 月至 5 月期间接受了远程医疗咨询。患者和医生被邀请在咨询后 3 天内完成满意度调查。
患者咨询了以下领域:喉科学、语音和吞咽(N=15;17.4%)、头颈部或整形手术(N=34;39.5%)、鼻科学(N=31;36.1%)和耳科学(N=6;7.0%)。医生估计,73.2%的情况下,临床检查不会改变咨询问题。9.3%的病例需要迅速进行延迟临床检查,33.7%的病例检查无用。5%的患者认为咨询没有得出可靠的结论。尽管大多数患者(87.7%)会在大流行期间向朋友/家人推荐远程医疗咨询,但只有 44.6%的患者会接受在大流行之外用远程医疗咨询代替门诊咨询。
远程医疗似乎是大流行和封锁期间的一种有趣的替代方法。由于患者进一步参与远程医疗的动机似乎取决于大流行的背景,因此仍需要努力了解患者对远程医疗的看法、满意度和担忧,以便在大流行之外实施。