Suppr超能文献

颅骨成形术后新发癫痫发作——一种对频发现象的不同看法。

New-onset seizures after cranioplasty-a different view on a putatively frequently observed phenomenon.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 May;163(5):1437-1442. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-04720-7. Epub 2021 Feb 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

New-onset seizures after cranioplasty (NOSAC) are reported to be a frequent complication of cranioplasty (CP) after decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC). There are considerable differences in the incidence of NOSAC and contradictory data about presumed risk factors in the literature. We suggest NOSAC to be a consequence of patients' initial condition which led to DHC, rather than a complication of subsequent CP. We conducted a retrospective analysis to verify our hypothesis.

METHODS

The medical records of all patients ≥ 18 years who underwent CP between 2002 and 2017 at our institution were evaluated including incidence of seizures, time of seizure onset, and presumed risk factors. Indication for DHC, type of implant used, timing of CP, patient age, presence of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VP shunt), and postoperative complications were compared between patients with and without NOSAC.

RESULTS

A total of 302 patients underwent CP between 2002 and 2017, 276 of whom were included in the outcome analysis and the incidence of NOSAC was 23.2%. Although time between DHC and CP differed significantly between DHC indication groups, time between DHC and seizure onset did not differ, suggesting the occurrence of seizures to be independent of the procedure of CP. Time of follow-up was the only factor associated with the occurrence of NOSAC.

CONCLUSION

New-onset seizures may be a consequence of the initial condition leading to DHC rather than of CP itself. Time of follow-up seems to play a major role in detection of new-onset seizures.

摘要

背景

去骨瓣减压术后颅骨修补术(CP)后新发癫痫(NOSAC)是减压性颅骨切除术(DHC)后 CP 的常见并发症。NOSAC 的发生率存在很大差异,文献中关于假定危险因素的数据也存在矛盾。我们认为 NOSAC 是导致患者发生 DHC 的初始状况的结果,而不是随后 CP 的并发症。我们进行了一项回顾性分析来验证我们的假设。

方法

评估了 2002 年至 2017 年期间在我院接受 CP 的所有年龄≥18 岁的患者的病历,包括癫痫发作的发生率、发作时间和假定的危险因素。比较了有和无 NOSAC 患者的 DHC 指征、使用的植入物类型、CP 时机、患者年龄、是否存在脑室腹腔分流(VP 分流)以及术后并发症。

结果

共有 302 例患者在 2002 年至 2017 年间接受了 CP,其中 276 例纳入了结局分析,NOSAC 的发生率为 23.2%。尽管 DHC 指征组之间的 DHC 与 CP 之间的时间间隔存在显著差异,但 DHC 与癫痫发作之间的时间间隔并无差异,这表明癫痫发作的发生与 CP 本身无关。随访时间是与 NOSAC 发生相关的唯一因素。

结论

新发癫痫可能是导致 DHC 的初始状况的结果,而不是 CP 本身。随访时间似乎在检测新发癫痫方面起着重要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75be/8053646/51a2c8114586/701_2021_4720_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验