Suppr超能文献

比较 2011-2015 年威斯康星州医疗补助索赔和妊娠风险评估监测系统的产后护理利用率。

Comparing Postpartum Care Utilization from Medicaid Claims and the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System in Wisconsin, 2011-2015.

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health, 1603 W. Taylor St., Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.

Division of Public Health, Wisconsin Department of Health Services, 1 W. Wilson St, Madison, WI, 53703, USA.

出版信息

Matern Child Health J. 2021 Mar;25(3):428-438. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03118-2. Epub 2021 Feb 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare two data sources from Wisconsin-Medicaid claims and Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) surveys-for measuring postpartum care utilization and to better understand the incongruence between the sources.

METHODS

We used linked Medicaid claims and PRAMS surveys of Wisconsin residents who delivered a live birth during 2011-2015 to assess women's postpartum care utilization. Three different definitions of postpartum care from Medicaid claims were employed to better examine bundled service codes and timing of care. We used one question from the PRAMS survey that asks women if they have had a postpartum checkup. Concordance between the two data sources was examined using Cohen's Kappa value. For women who reported having a postpartum checkup on PRAMS but did not have a Medicaid claim for a traditional postpartum visit, we determined the other types of health care visits these women had after delivery documented in the Medicaid claims.

RESULTS

Among the 2313 women with a Medicaid-paid delivery and who completed a PRAMS survey, 86.6% had claims for a postpartum visit during the first 12 weeks postpartum and 90.5% self-reported a postpartum checkup on PRAMS (percent agreement = 79.9%, Kappa = 0.015). The percent agreement and Kappa values varied based on the definition of postpartum care derived from the Medicaid claims data.

CONCLUSIONS

There was slight agreement between Medicaid claims and PRAMS data. Most women had Medicaid claims for postpartum care at some point in the first 12 weeks postpartum, although the timing of these visits was somewhat unclear due to the use of bundled service codes.

摘要

目的

比较来自威斯康星州医疗补助索赔和妊娠风险评估监测系统 (PRAMS) 调查的两个数据源,以衡量产后护理的利用情况,并更好地了解两个数据源之间的差异。

方法

我们使用链接的威斯康星州医疗补助索赔和 PRAMS 调查数据,对 2011 年至 2015 年期间分娩的居民进行产后护理利用情况评估。我们使用医疗补助索赔中的三种不同的产后护理定义,以更好地检查捆绑服务代码和护理时间。我们使用 PRAMS 调查中的一个问题,询问女性是否进行过产后检查。使用 Cohen 的 Kappa 值检查两个数据源之间的一致性。对于在 PRAMS 上报告进行过产后检查但没有医疗补助传统产后就诊索赔的女性,我们确定了这些女性在产后在医疗补助索赔中记录的其他类型的医疗保健就诊。

结果

在 2313 名有医疗补助支付分娩并完成 PRAMS 调查的女性中,86.6%的人在产后 12 周内有产后就诊的索赔,90.5%的人在 PRAMS 上自我报告进行了产后检查(百分比一致= 79.9%,Kappa=0.015)。基于从医疗补助索赔数据中得出的产后护理定义,百分比一致性和 Kappa 值有所不同。

结论

医疗补助索赔和 PRAMS 数据之间存在轻微的一致性。大多数女性在产后 12 周内的某个时候都有医疗补助产后护理的索赔,但由于使用了捆绑服务代码,这些就诊的时间有些不清楚。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验