Pediatric Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine/Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Pediatric Cardiology, Cook Children's Medical Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Echocardiography. 2021 Mar;38(3):402-409. doi: 10.1111/echo.14985. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
Strain derived from speckle-tracking echocardiography is emerging as a useful tool in the assessment of single ventricle function. The purpose of this study is to compare layer-specific longitudinal strain values in children with single, systemic right ventricles (sRV) using two commercially available software platforms (GE EchoPAC (EP) and TomTec (TT)).
Two readers analyzed two-dimensional longitudinal strain on EP (v 202) and TT (v 2.21.25) in 40 pediatric sRV patients. Intravendor reproducibility and intervendor agreement between layer-specific measurements were assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. Absolute difference (AbΔ) and relative mean errors (RME) were calculated. Subgroup comparisons (stratified by age, heart rate (HR), and frames per second (FPS): HR ratio) were made.
Median age was 4.4 years. 32 (80%) patients had hypoplastic left heart syndrome; 19 (48%) were post-Fontan. Intravendor reproducibility was excellent with high ICC (0.86-0.97). AbΔ between readers was small (1.2%-1.5%) with interobserver RME slightly higher for TT (11%-12% vs 8%-9% for EP). Layer-specific intervendor agreement was poor (ICC 0.45-0.62). Default layer comparisons (EP mid vs TT endo) showed good agreement (ICC 0.72-0.77) and less variability (AbΔ 2%, RME 15%) than layer-to-layer. There were no differences in ICC for groups dichotomized by age, HR, or FPS:HR ratio. sRV strain values are more negative when using EP.
Intravendor reproducibility for sRV peak longitudinal strain in children is excellent with acceptable variability between experienced users. Intervendor, layer-specific strain agreement is poor. Vendor default layer strain values show better agreement but are not interchangeable.
斑点追踪超声心动图衍生的应变正在成为评估单心室功能的有用工具。本研究的目的是比较两种商业可用软件平台(GE EchoPAC(EP)和 TomTec(TT))在单、系统性右心室(sRV)儿童中的层特异性纵向应变值。
两位读者使用 EP(v 202)和 TT(v 2.21.25)分析了 40 例 sRV 儿科患者的二维纵向应变。通过组内相关系数和 Bland-Altman 分析评估层特异性测量的内供应商可重复性和内供应商一致性。计算绝对差值(AbΔ)和相对平均误差(RME)。进行亚组比较(按年龄、心率(HR)和帧率(FPS)分层:HR 比)。
中位年龄为 4.4 岁。32 例(80%)患者存在左心发育不全综合征;19 例(48%)为 Fontan 术后。内供应商可重复性极好,ICC 较高(0.86-0.97)。读者之间的 AbΔ较小(1.2%-1.5%),TT 的观察者间 RME 略高(11%-12%比 EP 的 8%-9%)。层特异性供应商间一致性较差(ICC 0.45-0.62)。默认层比较(EP 中层与 TT 内膜)显示出良好的一致性(ICC 0.72-0.77)和较小的变异性(AbΔ 2%,RME 15%),优于层对层。按年龄、HR 或 FPS:HR 比二分的组中,ICC 无差异。使用 EP 时,sRV 应变值更负。
儿童 sRV 峰值纵向应变的内供应商可重复性极好,经验丰富的使用者之间的变异性可接受。供应商间、层特异性应变一致性较差。供应商默认层应变值显示出更好的一致性,但不能互换。