Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Oncologist. 2021 May;26(5):427-432. doi: 10.1002/onco.13698. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
Patients with brain tumors are at high risk for thromboembolic complications and frequently require anticoagulation. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are a less burdensome treatment for cancer-associated thrombosis with safety and efficacy comparable to those of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH); however, there are few data to support the use of DOACs in patients with brain tumors. The purpose of this study was to better understand the safety profile of anticoagulants in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors, with particular interest in the safety and efficacy of DOACs. Our hypothesis was that DOACs are as safe and effective as LWMH in this population. This study was conducted through a single-center retrospective chart review of 125 patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors on anticoagulation. Our primary outcomes were major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), with secondary outcomes of minor bleeding and recurrent thrombosis. The rate of major bleeding was 26% in the LMWH group versus 9.6% in the DOAC group (p = .03). The rate of ICH was 15% in the LMWH group versus 5.8% in the DOAC group (p = .09). The severity of ICH in both groups was low with median Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5 scores of 2 in the LMWH group and 3 in the DOAC group. The rates of minor bleeding and recurrent thrombosis were low in both groups. Our conclusion is that DOAC use in patients with brain tumors is not associated with increased rates of major bleeding compared with LMWH and is a safe and effective option. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Patients with brain tumors are at high risk for venous thromboembolism and frequently require anticoagulation. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are less burdensome than low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for treatment of thromboembolism, but there is concern in the community over increased risk of bleeding. This study provides much-needed objective evidence that there are fewer major bleeding events in patients with brain tumors on DOACs compared to LMWH with similar efficacy. As the paradigm of anticoagulation in patients with cancer shifts from LWMH toward DOACs, this work is particularly meaningful as it suggests DOACs are safe and effective for patients with brain tumors.
脑肿瘤患者发生血栓栓塞并发症的风险较高,通常需要抗凝治疗。直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)治疗癌症相关血栓形成的负担较小,其安全性和疗效与低分子肝素(LMWH)相当;然而,目前仅有少量数据支持 DOAC 用于脑肿瘤患者。本研究旨在更好地了解原发性和转移性脑肿瘤患者抗凝治疗的安全性概况,特别关注 DOAC 的安全性和疗效。我们的假设是,DOAC 在该人群中的安全性和疗效与 LMWH 相当。本研究通过对 125 例原发性和转移性脑肿瘤接受抗凝治疗的患者进行单中心回顾性图表审查进行。我们的主要结局是大出血和颅内出血(ICH),次要结局为小出血和复发性血栓形成。LMWH 组大出血发生率为 26%,DOAC 组为 9.6%(p =.03)。LMWH 组 ICH 发生率为 15%,DOAC 组为 5.8%(p =.09)。两组 ICH 的严重程度均较低,LMWH 组和 DOAC 组的常见不良事件术语标准 5 中位数分别为 2 和 3。两组小出血和复发性血栓形成的发生率均较低。我们的结论是,与 LMWH 相比,DOAC 用于脑肿瘤患者不会增加大出血的发生率,是一种安全有效的选择。对实践的意义:脑肿瘤患者发生静脉血栓栓塞的风险较高,通常需要抗凝治疗。直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)治疗血栓栓塞的负担小于低分子肝素(LMWH),但在社区中存在出血风险增加的担忧。本研究提供了急需的客观证据,表明 DOAC 治疗脑肿瘤患者的大出血事件少于 LMWH,且疗效相似。随着癌症患者抗凝治疗从 LMWH 向 DOAC 转变,这项工作意义尤为重大,因为它表明 DOAC 对脑肿瘤患者是安全有效的。