• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后等渗与低渗对比剂所致对比剂肾病及2年预后

Contrast Induced Nephropathy and 2-Year Outcomes of Iso-Osmolar Compared with Low-Osmolar Contrast Media after Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

作者信息

Du Mengyang, Jiang Lin, Tang Xiaofang, Gao Zhan, Xu Bo, Yuan Jinqing

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, The State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Korean Circ J. 2021 Feb;51(2):174-181. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2020.0307.

DOI:10.4070/kcj.2020.0307
PMID:33525073
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7853897/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the relative incidence of contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) and long-term outcomes between iso-osmolar contrast media (IOCM) and low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM) undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

A total of 9,431 patients receiving elective PCI were enrolled in the cohort. The patients were divided into IOCM group and LOCM group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to minimize the selection bias between groups.

RESULTS

The multivariate analysis showed that the use of IOCM compared with LOCM did not affect the CIN incidence (odds ratio [OR], 0.912; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.576-1.446; p=0.696). After PSM, the incidence of CIN was 1.5% and 4.0% in IOCM group (n=979) and LOCM group (n=979), respectively, p=0.001. IOCM significantly reduced the incidence of CIN compared with LOCM (OR, 0.393; 95% CI, 0.214-0.722; p=0.003). After 2 years of follow-up, the all-cause mortality was higher in IOCM group than LOCM group (2.1% vs. 0.9%, p<0.001). Cox regression analysis showed IOCM was not independent risk factor of 2-years all-cause mortality (OR, 0.849; 95% CI, 0.510-1.412; p=0.528). After PSM, the difference of all-cause death between groups disappeared (1.7% vs. 1.9%, p=0.739). Cox regression analysis showed that the use of IOCM compared with LOCM did not affect the incidence of 2-year all-cause mortality (OR, 1.037; 95% CI, 0.534-2.014; p=0.915).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with LOCM, IOCM significantly reduced the incidence of CIN after elective PCI, but had no significant effect on 2-year all-cause mortality.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究调查了等渗造影剂(IOCM)和低渗造影剂(LOCM)在接受择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)时对比剂肾病(CIN)的相对发生率及长期预后。

方法

共有9431例接受择期PCI的患者纳入该队列。患者被分为IOCM组和LOCM组。应用倾向评分匹配(PSM)以最小化组间选择偏倚。

结果

多因素分析显示,与LOCM相比,使用IOCM并不影响CIN发生率(比值比[OR],0.912;95%置信区间[CI],0.576 - 1.446;p = 0.696)。PSM后,IOCM组(n = 979)和LOCM组(n = 979)的CIN发生率分别为1.5%和4.0%,p = 0.001。与LOCM相比,IOCM显著降低了CIN发生率(OR,0.393;95% CI,0.214 - 0.722;p = 0.003)。随访2年后,IOCM组的全因死亡率高于LOCM组(2.1%对0.9%,p < 0.001)。Cox回归分析显示IOCM不是2年全因死亡率的独立危险因素(OR,0.849;95% CI,0.510 - 1.412;p = 0.528)。PSM后,组间全因死亡差异消失(1.7%对1.9%,p = 0.739)。Cox回归分析显示,与LOCM相比,使用IOCM并不影响2年全因死亡率的发生率(OR,1.037;95% CI,0.534 - 2.014;p = 0.915)。

结论

与LOCM相比,IOCM在择期PCI后显著降低了CIN发生率,但对2年全因死亡率无显著影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0649/7853897/5ff3726d61bb/kcj-51-174-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0649/7853897/5ff3726d61bb/kcj-51-174-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0649/7853897/5ff3726d61bb/kcj-51-174-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Contrast Induced Nephropathy and 2-Year Outcomes of Iso-Osmolar Compared with Low-Osmolar Contrast Media after Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后等渗与低渗对比剂所致对比剂肾病及2年预后
Korean Circ J. 2021 Feb;51(2):174-181. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2020.0307.
2
Long-Term Adverse Effects of Low-Osmolar Compared With Iso-Osmolar Contrast Media After Coronary Angiography.冠状动脉造影术后低渗对比剂与等渗对比剂的长期不良影响
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 1;118(7):985-90. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.07.017. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
3
Routine iso-osmolar contrast media use and acute kidney injury following percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后常规使用等渗造影剂与急性肾损伤
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2019 Oct;67(5):380-391. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4725.19.04925-9. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
4
Contrast media use in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing coronary angiography: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.慢性肾脏病患者冠状动脉造影中造影剂的使用:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Feb 1;228:137-144. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.170. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
5
6
Iso-osmolar vs low-osmolar contrast agents for coronary optical coherence tomography: a blinded prospective randomized controlled study.等渗与低渗对比剂在冠状动脉光相干断层成像中的应用:一项盲法前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2024 Jun;36(6). doi: 10.25270/jic/23.00136.
7
Comparative effect of iso-osmolar versus low-osmolar contrast media on the incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.等渗与低渗对比剂对糖尿病患者对比剂诱导急性肾损伤发生率影响的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Imaging. 2019 Jun 18;19(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40644-019-0224-6.
8
Different outcomes between iso-osmolar and low-osmolar contrast media in acute myocardial infarction with renal impairment.肾功能不全的急性心肌梗死患者中,等渗与低渗对比剂的结局不同。
Cardiol J. 2023;30(5):790-798. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2021.0171. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
9
Low-Osmolar vs. Iso-Osmolar Contrast Media on the Risk of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: A Propensity Score Matched Study.低渗与等渗对比剂对对比剂诱发急性肾损伤风险的影响:一项倾向评分匹配研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 29;9:862023. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.862023. eCollection 2022.
10
Comparative tolerability of contrast media used for coronary interventions.用于冠状动脉介入治疗的造影剂的相对耐受性
Drug Saf. 2002;25(15):1079-98. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200225150-00003.

引用本文的文献

1
Dual-Energy CT as a Well-Established CT Modality to Reduce Contrast Media Amount: A Systematic Review from the Computed Tomography Subspecialty Section of the Italian Society of Radiology.双能CT作为一种成熟的CT模式以减少造影剂用量:来自意大利放射学会计算机断层摄影亚专业组的系统评价
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 23;13(21):6345. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216345.
2
Iodixanol-associated acute kidney injury and prognosis in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective, multi-center study.接受择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中碘克沙醇相关急性肾损伤及其预后:一项前瞻性多中心研究
Eur Radiol. 2023 Dec;33(12):9444-9454. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09964-8. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative effect of iso-osmolar versus low-osmolar contrast media on the incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.等渗与低渗对比剂对糖尿病患者对比剂诱导急性肾损伤发生率影响的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Imaging. 2019 Jun 18;19(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40644-019-0224-6.
2
Incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in a large cohort of all-comers undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Comparison of five contrast media.在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的所有患者的大队列中,对比剂诱导的急性肾损伤的发生率:五种对比剂的比较。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Dec 15;273:69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.08.097. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
3
Three-Dimensional Kidney-on-a-Chip Assessment of Contrast-Induced Kidney Injury: Osmolality and Viscosity.
对比剂所致肾损伤的三维肾芯片评估:渗透压和黏度
Micromachines (Basel). 2022 Apr 28;13(5):688. doi: 10.3390/mi13050688.
4
The Pathophysiology and the Management of Radiocontrast-Induced Nephropathy.放射性造影剂所致肾病的病理生理学与管理
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jan 12;12(1):180. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12010180.
5
Different outcomes between iso-osmolar and low-osmolar contrast media in acute myocardial infarction with renal impairment.肾功能不全的急性心肌梗死患者中,等渗与低渗对比剂的结局不同。
Cardiol J. 2023;30(5):790-798. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2021.0171. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
6
Iso-osmolar Iodixanol Is Better than Low-osmolar Contrast for CIN Prevention. And Then?等渗碘克沙醇在预防造影剂肾病方面优于低渗造影剂。那又如何呢?
Korean Circ J. 2021 Feb;51(2):182-184. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2021.0003.
Contrast-induced nephropathy: Pathophysiology, risk factors, and prevention.
造影剂肾病:病理生理学、危险因素及预防
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2018 Jan-Feb;29(1):1-9. doi: 10.4103/1319-2442.225199.
4
Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: Pathophysiology, Manifestations, Prevention, and Management.对比剂诱导的急性肾损伤:病理生理学、表现、预防及管理
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2017 Nov;25(4):743-753. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
5
Understanding and preventing contrast-induced acute kidney injury.理解并预防对比剂诱导的急性肾损伤。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017 Mar;13(3):169-180. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2016.196. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
6
Long-Term Adverse Effects of Low-Osmolar Compared With Iso-Osmolar Contrast Media After Coronary Angiography.冠状动脉造影术后低渗对比剂与等渗对比剂的长期不良影响
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 1;118(7):985-90. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.07.017. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
7
Renal Safety of Iodinated Contrast Media Depending on Their Osmolarity - Current Outlooks.根据渗透压分类的碘化造影剂的肾脏安全性——当前观点
Pol J Radiol. 2016 Apr 11;81:157-65. doi: 10.12659/PJR.895406. eCollection 2016.
8
Is contrast medium osmolality a causal factor for contrast-induced nephropathy?对比剂渗透压是否是造影剂肾病的一个致病因素?
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:931413. doi: 10.1155/2014/931413. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
9
KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury.改善全球肾脏病预后组织(KDIGO)急性肾损伤临床实践指南
Nephron Clin Pract. 2012;120(4):c179-84. doi: 10.1159/000339789. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
10
Contrast-induced kidney injury: mechanisms, risk factors, and prevention.对比剂诱导的肾损伤:机制、危险因素与预防。
Eur Heart J. 2012 Aug;33(16):2007-15. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr494. Epub 2012 Jan 19.