• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肿瘤学家主导的咨询改善了中等收入亚洲国家癌症基因检测的可及性,且对心理社会结果无显著影响。

Oncologist-led counselling improves access to cancer genetic testing in middle-income Asian country, with no significant impact on psychosocial outcomes.

作者信息

Yoon Sook-Yee, Wong Siu Wan, Lim Joanna, Ahmad Syuhada, Mariapun Shivaani, Padmanabhan Heamanthaa, Hassan Nur Tiara, Lau Shao Yan, Ch'ng Gaik-Siew, Haniffa Muzhirah, Ong Winnie P, Rethanavelu Kavitha, Moey Lip Hen, Keng Wee Teik, Omar Jamil, Mohd Abas Mohd Norazam, Yong Chee Meng, Ramasamy Vickneswaren, Md Noor Mohd Rushdan, Aliyas Ismail, Lim Michael C K, Suberamaniam Anuradha, Mat Adenan Noor Azmi, Ahmad Zatul Akmar, Ho Gwo Fuang, Abdul Malik Rozita, Subramaniam Suguna, Khoo Boom Ping, Raja Arivendran, Chin Yeung Sing, Sim Wee Wee, Teh Beng Hock, Kho Swee Kiong, Ong Eunice S E, Voon Pei Jye, Ismail Ghazali, Lee Chui Ling, Abdullah Badrul Zaman, Loo Kwong Sheng, Lim Chun Sen, Lee Saw Joo, Lim Keng Joo Lim, Shafiee Mohamad Nasir, Ismail Fuad, Latiff Zarina Abdul, Ismail Mohd Pazudin, Mohamed Jamli Mohamad Faiz, Kumarasamy Suresh, Leong Kin Wah, Low John, Md Yusof Mastura, Ahmad Mustafa Ahmad Muzamir, Mat Ali Nor Huda, Makanjang Mary, Tayib Shahila, Cheah Nellie, Lim Boon Kiong, Fong Chee Kin, Foo Yoke Ching, Mellor Abdullah Matin, Tan Teck Sin, Chow Doris S Y, Ho Kean Fatt, Raman Rakesh, Radzi Ahmad, Deniel Azura, Teoh Daren C Y, Ang Soo Fan, Joseph Joseph K, Ng Paul Hock Oon, Tho Lye-Mun, Ahmad Azura Rozila, Muin Ileena, Bleiker Eveline, George Angela, Thong Meow-Keong, Woo Yin Ling, Teo Soo Hwang

机构信息

Genetic Counselling, Cancer Research Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia

Genetic Counselling, Cancer Research Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.

出版信息

J Med Genet. 2022 Mar;59(3):220-229. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107416. Epub 2021 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107416
PMID:33526602
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Identifying patients with mutations is clinically important to inform on the potential response to treatment and for risk management of patients and their relatives. However, traditional referral routes may not meet clinical needs, and therefore, mainstreaming cancer genetics has been shown to be effective in some high-income and high health-literacy settings. To date, no study has reported on the feasibility of mainstreaming in low-income and middle-income settings, where the service considerations and health literacy could detrimentally affect the feasibility of mainstreaming.

METHODS

The Mainstreaming Genetic Counselling for Ovarian Cancer Patients (MaGiC) study is a prospective, two-arm observational study comparing oncologist-led and genetics-led counselling. This study included 790 multiethnic patients with ovarian cancer from 23 sites in Malaysia. We compared the impact of different method of delivery of genetic counselling on the uptake of genetic testing and assessed the feasibility, knowledge and satisfaction of patients with ovarian cancer.

RESULTS

Oncologists were satisfied with the mainstreaming experience, with 95% indicating a desire to incorporate testing into their clinical practice. The uptake of genetic testing was similar in the mainstreaming and genetics arm (80% and 79%, respectively). Patient satisfaction was high, whereas decision conflict and psychological impact were low in both arms of the study. Notably, decisional conflict, although lower than threshold, was higher for the mainstreaming group compared with the genetics arm. Overall, 13.5% of patients had a pathogenic variant in or and there was no difference between psychosocial measures for carriers in both arms.

CONCLUSION

The MaGiC study demonstrates that mainstreaming cancer genetics is feasible in low-resource and middle-resource Asian setting and increased coverage for genetic testing.

摘要

背景

识别携带基因突变的患者对于了解潜在的治疗反应以及患者及其亲属的风险管理具有重要的临床意义。然而,传统的转诊途径可能无法满足临床需求,因此,在一些高收入和健康素养较高的地区,癌症遗传学主流化已被证明是有效的。迄今为止,尚无研究报道在低收入和中等收入地区进行主流化的可行性,因为这些地区的服务考量和健康素养可能会对主流化的可行性产生不利影响。

方法

卵巢癌患者遗传咨询主流化(MaGiC)研究是一项前瞻性双臂观察性研究,比较肿瘤学家主导的咨询和遗传学专家主导的咨询。该研究纳入了来自马来西亚23个地点的790名多民族卵巢癌患者。我们比较了不同遗传咨询方式对基因检测接受率的影响,并评估了卵巢癌患者的可行性、知识水平和满意度。

结果

肿瘤学家对主流化体验感到满意,95%的人表示希望将检测纳入他们的临床实践。主流化组和遗传学组的基因检测接受率相似(分别为80%和79%)。患者满意度较高,而研究的两组中决策冲突和心理影响都较低。值得注意的是,尽管决策冲突低于阈值,但主流化组的决策冲突高于遗传学组。总体而言,13.5%的患者在BRCA1或BRCA2中有致病性变异,两组中携带者的社会心理指标没有差异。

结论

MaGiC研究表明,在资源匮乏和中等资源的亚洲环境中,癌症遗传学主流化是可行的,并且提高了基因检测的覆盖率。

相似文献

1
Oncologist-led counselling improves access to cancer genetic testing in middle-income Asian country, with no significant impact on psychosocial outcomes.肿瘤学家主导的咨询改善了中等收入亚洲国家癌症基因检测的可及性,且对心理社会结果无显著影响。
J Med Genet. 2022 Mar;59(3):220-229. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107416. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
2
A pilot study investigating feasibility of mainstreaming germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing in high-risk patients with breast and/or ovarian cancer in three tertiary Cancer Centres in Ireland.一项试点研究,旨在调查在爱尔兰三个三级癌症中心对患有乳腺癌和/或卵巢癌的高危患者进行种系BRCA1和BRCA2检测纳入主流的可行性。
Fam Cancer. 2023 Apr;22(2):135-149. doi: 10.1007/s10689-022-00313-0. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
3
Evaluation of a Streamlined Oncologist-Led BRCA Mutation Testing and Counseling Model for Patients With Ovarian Cancer.简化的肿瘤专家主导的 BRCA 基因突变检测和咨询模型在卵巢癌患者中的评估。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 May 1;36(13):1300-1307. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.2781. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
4
Attitudes and training needs of oncologists and surgeons in mainstreaming breast cancer genetic counseling in a low-to-middle income Asian country.在一个中低收入的亚洲国家,将乳腺癌遗传咨询纳入主流,肿瘤学家和外科医生的态度和培训需求。
J Genet Couns. 2022 Oct;31(5):1080-1089. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1579. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
5
gene testing in women with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma.对高级别浆液性卵巢癌患者进行基因检测。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Aug;41(6):962-965. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2020.1820466. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
6
Uptake of testing for germline mutations in patients with non-mucinous epithelial ovarian cancers in Western Australia: a comparison of different genetic counseling methods.西澳大利亚州非黏液性上皮性卵巢癌患者种系突变检测的应用:不同遗传咨询方法的比较。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Jul;29(6):1038-1042. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000389. Epub 2019 May 17.
7
Finding all BRCA pathogenic mutation carriers: best practice models.寻找所有BRCA致病突变携带者:最佳实践模式。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Sep;24 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S19-26. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.95.
8
Mainstreaming cancer genetics: A model integrating germline BRCA testing into routine ovarian cancer clinics.将癌症遗传学纳入主流:一种将胚系 BRCA 检测纳入常规卵巢癌临床诊疗的模式。
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Apr;145(1):130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.01.030. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
9
Evaluation of Cancer-Based Criteria for Use in Mainstream BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genetic Testing in Patients With Breast Cancer.基于癌症的标准在乳腺癌患者主流 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 基因检测中的应用评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e194428. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4428.
10
Mainstreamed genetic testing for women with ovarian cancer: first-year experience.卵巢癌患者的主流基因检测:首年经验。
J Med Genet. 2019 Mar;56(3):195-198. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-105140. Epub 2018 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of the development of genetic counseling practices in Asia.亚洲遗传咨询实践发展的范围综述。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Jun;34(3):e70036. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70036.
2
Experience of urologists, oncologists and nurse practitioners with mainstream genetic testing in metastatic prostate cancer.泌尿外科医生、肿瘤学家和执业护士在转移性前列腺癌主流基因检测方面的经验。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024 Dec 5. doi: 10.1038/s41391-024-00925-w.
3
Implications of genetic testing and informed consent before and after genetic testing in individuals with cancer.
癌症患者基因检测前后基因检测及知情同意的意义。
World J Clin Oncol. 2024 Aug 24;15(8):975-981. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i8.975.
4
Mainstream germline genetic testing in men with metastatic prostate cancer: design and protocol for a multicenter observational study.转移性前列腺癌男性的主流种系基因检测:一项多中心观察性研究的设计和方案。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Dec 30;22(1):1365. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10429-2.
5
Overview on population screening for carriers with germline BRCA mutation in China.中国遗传性BRCA突变携带者群体筛查概述
Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 9;12:1002360. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1002360. eCollection 2022.
6
From the patient to the population: Use of genomics for population screening.从患者到人群:基因组学在人群筛查中的应用。
Front Genet. 2022 Oct 24;13:893832. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.893832. eCollection 2022.
7
Mainstream genetic testing for women with ovarian cancer provides a solid basis for patients to make a well-informed decision about genetic testing.针对卵巢癌女性的主流基因检测为患者做出关于基因检测的明智决定提供了坚实基础。
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2022 Sep 8;20(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13053-022-00238-w.
8
The Feasibility of Implementing Mainstream Germline Genetic Testing in Routine Cancer Care-A Systematic Review.在常规癌症护理中实施主流种系基因检测的可行性——一项系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 19;14(4):1059. doi: 10.3390/cancers14041059.
9
Psychosocial outcome and health behaviour intent of breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 and PALB2 pathogenic variants unselected by a priori risk.未经先验风险选择的 BRCA1/2 和 PALB2 致病性变异的乳腺癌患者的心理社会结局和健康行为意向。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 15;17(2):e0263675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263675. eCollection 2022.
10
Positive experiences of healthcare professionals with a mainstreaming approach of germline genetic testing for women with ovarian cancer.医护人员对卵巢癌女性进行种系基因检测主流化方法的积极体验。
Fam Cancer. 2022 Jul;21(3):295-304. doi: 10.1007/s10689-021-00277-7. Epub 2021 Oct 7.