State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral Medicine, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Oral Dis. 2022 Apr;28(3):670-681. doi: 10.1111/odi.13790. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
To examine the comparative efficacy and safety of topical administration for oral lichen planus.
An electronic database search (1st January 1946 to 1st May 2020) for randomised controlled trials identified 34 studies involving eight interventions (clobetasol, betamethasone, triamcinolone, dexamethasone, fluocinolone, tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, and cyclosporine); these studies were subjected to network meta-analysis using direct and indirect comparisons [efficacy indicators: clinical response rate, symptom-reducing effect (visual analogue scale score), sign-reducing effect (Thongprasom-scale score) and relapse; safety indicator: adverse event occurrence].
Compared with placebo, tacrolimus had the best clinical response rate (odds ratio (OR), 57.78 [95% CI 3.15-1060.52]; P-score, 0.8654) and cyclosporine had the worst (OR, 3.61[95% CI 0.20-66.62]; P-score, 0.2236); tacrolimus had the best symptom-reducing effect (standardised mean difference (SMD), 1.06 [95% CI 0.41-1.71]; P-score, 0.9323) and fluocinolone had the worst (SMD, -0.54 [95% CI -1.44-0.36]; P-score, 0.0157); dexamethasone had the best sign-reducing effect (SMD, 3.60 [95% CI 1.74-5.45]; P-score, 0.8306) and clobetasol had the worst (SMD, 2.63 [95% CI 1.66-3.61]; P-score, 0.2581); and pimecrolimus performed best (OR, 0.04 [95% CI 0.00-0.64]; P-score, 0.9227) and clobetasol performed the worst [OR, 0.60; 95% CI 0.15-2.45; P-score, 0.2545] in reducing relapse. Regarding safety, dexamethasone was the safest compared with placebo [OR, 0.37; 95% CI 0.05-2.57; P-score, 0.9337), whereas fluocinolone ranked low for safety [OR, 9.48; 95% CI 1.50- 60.03; P-score, 0.1189].
The relative ranking of topical administration varies according to the different indicators. Based on the joint consideration of clinical response rate and adverse event occurrence, dexamethasone, triamcinolone and betamethasone are recommended for better efficacy and safety. The optimal treatment for oral lichen patients varies under different conditions.
研究口腔扁平苔藓局部给药的疗效和安全性。
对 1946 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 5 月 1 日的电子数据库进行检索(随机对照试验),共纳入 34 项研究,涉及 8 种干预措施(卤米松、倍他米松、曲安奈德、地塞米松、氟轻松、他克莫司、吡美莫司和环孢素);采用直接和间接比较的网络荟萃分析(疗效指标:临床缓解率、症状缓解效果(视觉模拟量表评分)、体征缓解效果(Thongprasom 量表评分)和复发;安全性指标:不良反应发生情况)。
与安慰剂相比,他克莫司的临床缓解率最高(比值比(OR)57.78 [95%置信区间 3.15-1060.52];P 评分 0.8654),环孢素的最低(OR 3.61 [95%置信区间 0.20-66.62];P 评分 0.2236);他克莫司的症状缓解效果最好(标准化均数差(SMD)1.06 [95%置信区间 0.41-1.71];P 评分 0.9323),氟轻松的最差(SMD -0.54 [95%置信区间 -1.44-0.36];P 评分 0.0157);地塞米松的体征缓解效果最好(SMD 3.60 [95%置信区间 1.74-5.45];P 评分 0.8306),氯倍他索的最差(SMD 2.63 [95%置信区间 1.66-3.61];P 评分 0.2581);吡美莫司的复发率最低(OR 0.04 [95%置信区间 0.00-0.64];P 评分 0.9227),氯倍他索的复发率最高(OR 0.60;95%置信区间 0.15-2.45;P 评分 0.2545)。安全性方面,地塞米松与安慰剂相比最安全(OR 0.37;95%置信区间 0.05-2.57;P 评分 0.9337),而氟轻松的安全性最低(OR 9.48;95%置信区间 1.50-60.03;P 评分 0.1189)。
根据不同的指标,局部给药的相对排名不同。基于临床缓解率和不良反应发生率的综合考虑,建议使用地塞米松、曲安奈德和倍他米松以获得更好的疗效和安全性。口腔扁平苔藓患者的最佳治疗方案因不同情况而异。