Department of Radiology.
Department of Orthopedics, General Hospital of Jizhong Energy Xingtai Mining Group, Xingtai, Hebei, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jan 29;100(4):e24207. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024207.
Currently, minute structures, such as cervical nerve roots, can be viewed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences; however, studies comparing multiple sequences in the same set of patients are rare. The aim of the study is to compare the diagnostic values of three 3.0-T MRI sequences used in the imaging of cervical nerve roots.This study included 2 phases. In the first phase (n = 45 patients), the most optimal MRI sequence was determined. In the second phase, this MRI sequence was compared with surgical results (n = 31 patients). The three-dimensional double-echo steady-state (3D-DESS), multi-echo data image combination (MEDIC), and 3D sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolutions (3D-SPACE) sequences were performed to analyze the image quality. Furthermore, the most optimal MRI sequence was compared with surgical results to determine the agreement rate.The image quality scores of the 3 sequences were significantly different (P < .05). The score for 3D-DESS sequence was superior to that of MEDIC sequence, while the score for 3D-SPACE sequence was the worst. For visualization of compressed nerve roots, 3D-DESS sequence was superior to the other 2 sequences in terms of the total quality score and compressed nerve root score. Therefore, 3D-DESS sequence was used for MRI in 31 patients with cervical spondylosis in the second phase of this study. The diagnostic agreement rate was 93.5%.This study concluded that in patients with cervical radiculopathy, the 3D-DESS sequence is superior to the MEDIC and 3D-SPACE sequences and shows a high agreement rate with the surgical diagnosis.
目前,使用磁共振成像(MRI)序列可以观察到颈椎神经根等微小结构;然而,在同一组患者中比较多种序列的研究很少。本研究旨在比较用于颈椎神经根成像的三种 3.0T MRI 序列的诊断价值。
该研究包括两个阶段。在第一阶段(n=45 例患者),确定了最优化的 MRI 序列。在第二阶段,将该 MRI 序列与手术结果进行比较(n=31 例患者)。进行三维双回波稳态(3D-DESS)、多回波数据图像组合(MEDIC)和三维采样完美应用优化对比使用不同翻转角演化(3D-SPACE)序列来分析图像质量。此外,将最优化的 MRI 序列与手术结果进行比较,以确定符合率。
三种序列的图像质量评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。3D-DESS 序列的评分优于 MEDIC 序列,而 3D-SPACE 序列的评分最差。对于受压神经根的可视化,3D-DESS 序列在总质量评分和受压神经根评分方面优于其他两种序列。因此,在本研究的第二阶段,31 例颈椎病患者采用 3D-DESS 序列进行 MRI。诊断符合率为 93.5%。
本研究得出结论,在患有颈椎病神经根病的患者中,3D-DESS 序列优于 MEDIC 和 3D-SPACE 序列,与手术诊断具有很高的一致性。