• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗 PD-1/PD-L1 单药治疗与复发性或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者标准治疗的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Anti-PD1/PD-L1 monotherapy vs standard of care in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Central Laboratory, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jan 29;100(4):e24339. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024339.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000024339
PMID:33530227
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7850637/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In recent years, a number of clinical trials for antibody drugs targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1)/programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) have been carried out on recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M SCCHN) and reported promising prospects. To further evaluate and understand the effects and risk of anti-PD1/PD-L1 monotherapy vs standard of care (SoC) in R/M SCCHN, we conducted this meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials.

METHOD

The potential eligible trials were searched from Cochrane library and Pubmed and Embase databases. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects and risk of anti-PD1/PD-L1 monotherapy vs SoC in platinum refractory R/M SCCHN were selected. The outcomes, including objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and treatment-related adverse events, were extracted and pooled.

RESULTS

1345 patients with R/M SCCHN from three randomized controlled trials were enrolled in this analysis. Compared with SoC, anti-PD1/PD-L1 monotherapy could provide statistically significant overall survival benefit, hazard ratio (95% confidence interval ) = 0.79 [0.70-0.90]. However, we observed no significant difference between 2 treatments in progression-free survival (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.96 [0.85-1.09]). Furthermore, anti-PD1/PD-L1 monotherapy caused less treatment-related adverse events than standard of care.

CONCLUSION

Anti-PD1/PD-L1 monotherapy could indeed reduce the risk of death in R/M SCCHN patients, and provide higher safety vs SoC. Expression level of PD-L1 may be a useful biomarker for selecting patients with better response to anti-PD1/PD-L1 monotherapy.

摘要

背景

近年来,针对复发性或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌(R/M SCCHN)的程序性细胞死亡蛋白 1(PD1)/程序性细胞死亡配体 1(PD-L1)抗体药物的临床试验不断开展,并取得了有前景的结果。为了进一步评估和了解抗 PD1/PD-L1 单药治疗与标准治疗(SoC)在 R/M SCCHN 中的疗效和风险,我们对已发表的随机对照试验进行了这项荟萃分析。

方法

从 Cochrane 图书馆和 Pubmed、Embase 数据库中检索可能的合格试验。选择评估抗 PD1/PD-L1 单药治疗与铂类难治性 R/M SCCHN 中 SoC 的疗效和风险的随机对照试验。提取并汇总了客观缓解率、疾病控制率、无进展生存期、总生存期和治疗相关不良事件等结局。

结果

本分析纳入了三项随机对照试验中的 1345 例 R/M SCCHN 患者。与 SoC 相比,抗 PD1/PD-L1 单药治疗可提供具有统计学意义的总生存期获益,风险比(95%置信区间)=0.79 [0.70-0.90]。然而,我们观察到两种治疗方法在无进展生存期方面无显著差异(风险比[95%置信区间] = 0.96 [0.85-1.09])。此外,抗 PD1/PD-L1 单药治疗比标准治疗导致的治疗相关不良事件更少。

结论

抗 PD1/PD-L1 单药治疗确实可以降低 R/M SCCHN 患者的死亡风险,并与 SoC 相比提供更高的安全性。PD-L1 的表达水平可能是预测对抗 PD1/PD-L1 单药治疗反应更好的患者的有用生物标志物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82a4/7850637/b2ae6153169a/medi-100-e24339-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82a4/7850637/7c8f82f689fe/medi-100-e24339-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82a4/7850637/ad377dfd3965/medi-100-e24339-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82a4/7850637/4de981f8e8c3/medi-100-e24339-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82a4/7850637/b2ae6153169a/medi-100-e24339-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82a4/7850637/7c8f82f689fe/medi-100-e24339-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82a4/7850637/ad377dfd3965/medi-100-e24339-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82a4/7850637/4de981f8e8c3/medi-100-e24339-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82a4/7850637/b2ae6153169a/medi-100-e24339-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Anti-PD1/PD-L1 monotherapy vs standard of care in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.抗 PD-1/PD-L1 单药治疗与复发性或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者标准治疗的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jan 29;100(4):e24339. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024339.
2
PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus standard of care in the first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂联合化疗与标准治疗方案用于复发性或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌一线治疗的比较
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Jan;280(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07571-9. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
3
Immunotherapy in recurrent and or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.免疫疗法在复发性和/或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌中的应用。
Curr Opin Oncol. 2019 May;31(3):146-151. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000522.
4
Durvalumab for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Results from a single-arm, phase II study in patients with ≥25% tumour cell PD-L1 expression who have progressed on platinum-based chemotherapy.度伐利尤单抗治疗复发或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌:在肿瘤细胞 PD-L1 表达≥25%且在铂类化疗后进展的患者中进行的一项单臂、Ⅱ期研究结果。
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Jan;107:142-152. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.11.015. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
5
The effects and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors on head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PD-1/PD-L1 抑制剂对头颈部癌症的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Med. 2019 Oct;8(13):5969-5978. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2510. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
6
Safety and Efficacy of Durvalumab With or Without Tremelimumab in Patients With PD-L1-Low/Negative Recurrent or Metastatic HNSCC: The Phase 2 CONDOR Randomized Clinical Trial.度伐利尤单抗单药或联合替西木单抗治疗 PD-L1 低表达/阴性复发性或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者的安全性和有效性:Ⅱ期 CONDOR 随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;5(2):195-203. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4628.
7
Programmed Death-1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1-Axis Blockade in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Stratified by Human Papillomavirus Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.程序性死亡受体 1/程序性死亡配体 1 轴阻断在复发性或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌中按人乳头瘤病毒状态分层:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Immunol. 2021 Apr 7;12:645170. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.645170. eCollection 2021.
8
Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.免疫检查点抑制剂在复发性或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌中的疗效和安全性:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Med. 2023 Oct;12(20):20277-20286. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6564. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
9
Frameshift events predict anti-PD-1/L1 response in head and neck cancer.移码事件可预测头颈部癌症对 PD-1/L1 治疗的反应。
JCI Insight. 2018 Feb 22;3(4). doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.98811.
10
Role of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PD-1/PD-L1 抑制剂在复发性/转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌治疗中的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2021 Sep;46(5):1013-1020. doi: 10.1111/coa.13772. Epub 2021 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Nivolumab resistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients and future perspectives.头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者的纳武单抗耐药性及未来展望
Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2025;29(1):22-27. doi: 10.5114/wo.2025.149237. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
2
Low expression of ACOT13 predicts poor prognosis and immunotherapy outcome in ovarian cancer.ACOT13低表达预示卵巢癌预后不良及免疫治疗效果不佳。
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Apr 15;16(4):1424-1441. doi: 10.62347/OIQB4997. eCollection 2024.
3
The Role of Different Immunocompetent Cell Populations in the Pathogenesis of Head and Neck Cancer-Regulatory Mechanisms of Pro- and Anti-Cancer Activity and Their Impact on Immunotherapy.
不同免疫活性细胞群在头颈癌发病机制中的作用——促癌和抗癌活性的调节机制及其对免疫治疗的影响
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 7;15(6):1642. doi: 10.3390/cancers15061642.
4
Comparison of Second-Line Treatments for Patients with Platinum-Resistant Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.铂耐药复发或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者二线治疗的比较:一项系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 15;14(18):4472. doi: 10.3390/cancers14184472.
5
Combination of Tumor Mutational Burden and Specific Gene Mutations Stratifies Outcome to Immunotherapy Across Recurrent and Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.肿瘤突变负荷与特定基因突变的组合可对复发性和转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌免疫治疗的结果进行分层。
Front Genet. 2021 Nov 16;12:756506. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.756506. eCollection 2021.
6
Anti-PD-1 and Anti-PD-L1 in Head and Neck Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.抗 PD-1 和抗 PD-L1 在头颈部肿瘤中的应用:一项网状荟萃分析。
Front Immunol. 2021 Aug 9;12:705096. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.705096. eCollection 2021.
7
Comparisons of Underlying Mechanisms, Clinical Efficacy and Safety Between Anti-PD-1 and Anti-PD-L1 Immunotherapy: The State-of-the-Art Review and Future Perspectives.抗PD-1与抗PD-L1免疫疗法的潜在机制、临床疗效及安全性比较:最新综述与未来展望
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jul 7;12:714483. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.714483. eCollection 2021.