Medical Faculty of Harran University, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Harran University, Sanliurfa, Turkey.
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Cardiovasc Hematol Disord Drug Targets. 2021;21(1):66-72. doi: 10.2174/1871529X21666210202111332.
Bupivacaine and Levobupivacaine are frequently used local anesthetic drugs in spinal anesthesia practice. Both agents have arrhythmic effects on the heart. However, there is no clear information about which agent is more arrhythmogenic.
The aim of this article is to investigate the effects of bupivacaine and its S (-)-enantiomer, levobupivacaine, on cardiac arrhythmias in patients.
The study included 40 patients scheduled for inguinal hernia surgery. Patients were randomly divided into the following two groups using a sealed envelope method: Group I, the bupivacaine group (n = 20); and Group II, the levobupivacaine group (n = 20). The QT values were taken preoperatively and during the 10th of the spinal block, the 10th of the surgical incision, and the 10th postoperative minute. Additionally, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), oxygen saturation (SO), and heart rate (HR) values, in addition to motor block (Bromage scale) levels and durations, were recorded for each patient.
HR values measured at 10 min after spinal block were significantly higher than the baseline values in the levobupivacaine group (p < 0.05). The corrected QT interval (QTc) values increased significantly at 10 minutes after spinal block and at 10 min postoperatively in the bupivacaine group (p < 0.05). QTd and QTcd measurements were taken at the 10th minute of spinal anesthesia, the 10th minute of the incision, and the 10th minute postoperatively. When compared to the levobupivacaine group, a statistically significant increase was found in the bupivacaine group (p < 0.05).
Levobupivacaine allows greater hemodynamic stability, while bupivacaine affects QTc and QTd measurement times more. As such, we believe that levobupivacaine may be a better alternative to bupivacaine during clinical practice, particularly in patients with cardiac problems.
布比卡因和左旋布比卡因是椎管内麻醉中常用的局部麻醉药物。这两种药物都对心脏有心律失常作用。然而,关于哪种药物更致心律失常,目前尚无明确信息。
本文旨在研究布比卡因及其 S(-)对映体左旋布比卡因对患者心脏心律失常的影响。
本研究纳入了 40 例行腹股沟疝手术的患者。采用密封信封法将患者随机分为两组:布比卡因组(n=20)和左旋布比卡因组(n=20)。在术前、椎管内阻滞第 10 分钟、手术切口第 10 分钟和术后第 10 分钟测量 QT 值。同时,记录每位患者的收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、平均动脉压(MAP)、氧饱和度(SO)和心率(HR)值,以及运动阻滞(Bromage 量表)水平和持续时间。
椎管内阻滞 10 分钟后,左旋布比卡因组的 HR 值明显高于基础值(p<0.05)。布比卡因组在椎管内阻滞 10 分钟后和术后 10 分钟时校正 QT 间期(QTc)值显著增加(p<0.05)。在椎管内麻醉第 10 分钟、切口第 10 分钟和术后第 10 分钟时测量 QTd 和 QTcd。与左旋布比卡因组相比,布比卡因组有显著增加(p<0.05)。
左旋布比卡因可提供更大的血液动力学稳定性,而布比卡因对 QTc 和 QTd 测量时间的影响更大。因此,我们认为在临床实践中,左旋布比卡因可能是布比卡因的更好选择,特别是在有心脏问题的患者中。