Centre for Health, Law, and Society, University of Bristol Law School, Bristol, England, UK.
Med Law Rev. 2021 Aug 11;29(2):337-346. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwab001.
In A NHS Foundation Trust v MC, the Court of Protection revisits the question of whether adults should be allowed to act as bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell donors if they lack decision-making capacity. This case note explores the positive and problematic implications of the case based on points that were raised in the judicial reasoning that specifically relate to i) practical implications concerning the key players in this environment, ii) the risk analysis within the best interest determination, iii) altruism and iv) the wider context as it relates to minor donors who lack capacity.
在 NHS 基金会信托公司诉 MC 案中，保护法院重新审议了如果成年人缺乏决策能力，是否应该允许他们充当骨髓或外周血干细胞供体的问题。本案例注释基于司法推理中特别涉及以下方面的要点，探讨了该案的积极和有问题的影响：(i) 与该环境中的主要参与者有关的实际影响，(ii) 最佳利益决定中的风险分析，(iii) 利他主义，以及 (iv) 与缺乏能力的未成年供体有关的更广泛背景。
