Traction methods in the retrograde intramedullary nailing of femur shaft fractures: the double reverse traction repositor or manual traction.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this prospective study was to compare the double reverse traction repositor (DRTR) and manual traction in retrograde intramedullary nailing (RE-IMN) for femoral shaft fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-seven patients with femur shaft fractures were randomized to undergo surgery with either DRTR or manual traction (MT) to facilitate RE-IMN between January 2018 and January 2019. Demographics, fracture characteristics, surgical data, post-operative complications, and functional outcomes were assessed. Data from 72 patients completing the final follow-up (12 months) were analysed in this study.

RESULTS

The average number of intra-operative perspectives in the DRTR group was 27.7, which was significantly reduced compared with that in the MT group (31.3, p < 0.001). Fewer assistants were required in the DRTR group compared with the MT group (1.1 vs 1.9, p < 0.001). Fewer patients with open reduction were discovered in the DRTR group compared with the MT group (2.8 vs 19.4, p=0.024). Demographics, fracture characteristics, other surgical data, and prognostic parameters were comparative between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The DRTR can be effectively and safely used to treat femur shaft fractures with RE-IMN. The DRTR achieves similar results as MT and is also superior to MT in terms of intra-operative perspectives, the number of assistants, and the open reduction rate.