• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“所见未必所得”:鸽子的反向关联和感知损失规避。

"What you see may not be what you get": Reverse contingency and perceived loss aversion in pigeons.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506-0044, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Jun;28(3):1015-1020. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01872-y. Epub 2021 Feb 2.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-020-01872-y
PMID:33532984
Abstract

The reverse-contingency task is a task in which one is given a choice between two rewards, but one receives the larger amount only if one chooses the smaller amount. This task is very difficult for chimpanzees unless the choice is between symbolic representations of the amounts. We found that pigeons can learn this task easily, if the reward amounts are associated with distinctive colors and the choice is delayed by 5 s. The reverse-contingency task involves three components: a loss when choosing one alternative, a gain when choosing the other, and the contrast between what was expected and what occurred. In Experiment 2 we separated the loss from the gain and found that experiencing a loss is sufficient for pigeons to learn to avoid that alternative. Finally, we found evidence for perceived loss aversion. When pigeons were offered a small amount of food and they received that amount, they preferred it over an alternative that offered them a larger amount but gave them only the smaller amount (a perceived loss). The results indicate that loss aversion, based on reference dependence, is likely a general phenomenon, and not only found in humans and other primates. We suggest that it can be attributed to contrast, the difference between what is expected and what is obtained, and it is related to the endowment effect and the mere ownership effect found in humans.

摘要

逆关联任务是指在两个奖励之间进行选择,但只有选择较小的奖励才能获得较大的奖励。除非选择的是奖励金额的象征性表示,否则对于黑猩猩来说,这个任务非常困难。我们发现,如果奖励金额与独特的颜色相关联,并且选择可以延迟 5 秒,鸽子可以很容易地学习这个任务。逆关联任务涉及三个组成部分:选择一个替代方案时会损失,选择另一个替代方案时会获得,以及预期和实际发生之间的对比。在实验 2 中,我们将损失与收益分开,发现鸽子经历损失足以使其学会避免选择那个替代方案。最后,我们发现了对感知损失厌恶的证据。当鸽子获得少量食物时,它们更喜欢得到那少量食物,而不是另一种选择,这种选择会给它们提供更多的食物,但只给它们少量食物(感知损失)。结果表明,基于参照依赖的损失厌恶很可能是一种普遍现象,不仅存在于人类和其他灵长类动物中。我们认为,它可以归因于对比,即预期和获得之间的差异,并且与人类中发现的禀赋效应和单纯所有权效应有关。

相似文献

1
"What you see may not be what you get": Reverse contingency and perceived loss aversion in pigeons.“所见未必所得”:鸽子的反向关联和感知损失规避。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Jun;28(3):1015-1020. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01872-y. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
2
Pigeons are attracted to a perceived gain without an actual gain.鸽子被感知到的收益而不是实际的收益所吸引。
Anim Cogn. 2021 May;24(3):605-611. doi: 10.1007/s10071-020-01452-6. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
3
Evidence for a magnitude effect in probability discounting with pigeons.鸽子概率折扣中量级效应的证据。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2015 Oct;41(4):406-18. doi: 10.1037/xan0000077. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
4
Discounting of delayed food rewards in pigeons and rats: is there a magnitude effect?鸽子和大鼠对延迟食物奖励的折扣:是否存在量级效应?
J Exp Anal Behav. 2004 Jan;81(1):39-50. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2004.81-39.
5
Chimpanzees can point to smaller amounts of food to accumulate larger amounts but they still fail the reverse-reward contingency task.黑猩猩能够指向较少数量的食物以积累更多食物,但它们在反向奖励应急任务中仍然失败。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2016 Oct;42(4):347-358. doi: 10.1037/xan0000115. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
6
Cognitive flexibility and dual processing in pigeons: Temporal and contextual control of midsession reversal.鸽子的认知灵活性与双重加工:中期逆转的时间和情境控制
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2018 Apr;44(2):149-161. doi: 10.1037/xan0000161. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
7
Early commitment facilitates optimal choice by pigeons.早期的倾向有助于鸽子做出最佳选择。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Jun;24(3):957-963. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1173-8.
8
The paradoxical performance by different species on the ephemeral reward task.不同物种在短暂奖励任务中的矛盾表现。
Learn Behav. 2021 Mar;49(1):99-105. doi: 10.3758/s13420-020-00429-2.
9
Do pigeons (Columba livia) study for a test?鸽子(家鸽)会为考试而学习吗?
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Apr;35(2):129-42. doi: 10.1037/a0013722.
10
Midsession reversal learning: Pigeons learn what stimulus to avoid.中期逆转学习:鸽子学会避免何种刺激。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2020 Apr;46(2):101-106. doi: 10.1037/xan0000240.

本文引用的文献

1
Responses to quantity: perceptual versus cognitive mechanisms in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).对数量的反应:黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)的感知与认知机制
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1995 Jan;21(1):82-6. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.21.1.82.