Acta Chim Slov. 2020 Sep;67(3):904-915.
This paper aims to identify differences in the justification of the selection of 3D dynamic submicroscopic-representation (SMR) of the solid and liquid states of water, as well as the freezing of water presented in selected authentic tasks. According to students' achievements in solving these tasks at different levels of education, their explanations were identified. To explain in greater detail how students attempted to solve the authentic tasks, an eye-tracking method was used to identify the differences in the total fixation durations on specific areas of interest at the specific SMRs between successful and unsuccessful students in three age groups. A total of 79 students participated in this research. The data were collected with a structured interview conducted with students when solving three authentic tasks displayed on the computer screen. The tasks comprise text (as problem and questions), macro-images (photos of the phenomena) and SMRs of the phenomena. The eye-tracker was also used to measure the students' gaze fixations at the particular area of interest. The results show that successful students' justifications for a correct SMR include macroscopic and sub-microscopic representations of the chosen concepts. Along different stages of education, the selection success increases and sufficient justifications comprise the sub-microscopic level. It could be concluded that there are mostly no significant differences between successful and unsuccessful students within the same age group in the total fixation duration at the correct SMR. Further studies are needed to investigate the information-processing strategies between high and low achievers in solving various authentic tasks comprising SMRs and those that integrate all three levels of the representation of chemical concepts.
本文旨在识别在选定的真实任务中,水的固液状态的 3D 动态亚微观表示(SMR)选择以及水的冻结的论证方面存在的差异。根据学生在不同教育水平上解决这些任务的成绩,对他们的解释进行了识别。为了更详细地解释学生如何尝试解决真实任务,使用眼动追踪方法来识别在三个年龄组中,成功和不成功学生在特定 SMR 上对特定感兴趣区域的总注视时间差异。共有 79 名学生参加了这项研究。数据是通过在计算机屏幕上显示三个真实任务时与学生进行的结构化访谈收集的。这些任务包括文本(作为问题和问题)、宏观图像(现象的照片)和现象的 SMR。还使用眼动追踪器来测量学生在特定感兴趣区域的注视点。结果表明,成功学生对正确 SMR 的论证包括所选择概念的宏观和亚微观表示。随着教育阶段的不同,选择成功率增加,充分的论证包括亚微观层面。可以得出结论,在同一年龄组中,成功学生和不成功学生在正确 SMR 上的总注视时间差异不大。需要进一步研究解决各种包含 SMR 的真实任务以及整合化学概念的三个表示层次的高成就者和低成就者之间的信息处理策略。