Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Human Pathology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jul;36(7):1927-1934. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15425. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
Magnifying endoscopy (ME) diagnostic algorithm for early gastric cancer (EGC) relies on qualitative features such as microvascular (MV) architecture and microsurface structure; however, it is a "static" diagnostic algorithm that uses still images. ME can visualize red blood cell flow within subepithelial microvessels in real time. Here, we evaluated the utility of using the MV blood flow rate in combination with ME for the diagnosis of EGC as a retrospective study.
Patients with differentiated-type EGC (n = 10) or patchy redness (n = 10) underwent ME with blue laser imaging. The mean MV blood flow rates of EGC, patchy redness, and background mucosa were calculated by the mean movement distance of one tagging red blood cell using split images of ME with blue laser imaging videos. We compared the mean MV blood flow rate between EGC, patchy redness, and background mucosa and also calculated the MV blood flow imaging ratio (inside lesion/background mucosa) between EGC and patchy redness.
Mean MV blood flow rate was significantly lower in EGC (1481 μm/s; range 1057-1762) than in patchy redness (3859 μm/s; 2435-5899) or background mucosa (4140.6 μm/s; 2820-6247) (P < 0.01). The MV blood flow imaging ratio was significantly lower in EGC (0.39; 0.27-0.62) than in patchy redness (0.90; 0.78-1.1) (P < 0.01).
Dynamic diagnosis with MV blood flow rate using ME may be useful for the differential diagnosis of EGC and patchy redness. Endoscopic assessment of dynamic processes within the gastric mucosa may facilitate the diagnosis of EGC.
放大内镜(ME)诊断早期胃癌(EGC)的算法依赖于微血管(MV)结构和微表面结构等定性特征;然而,它是一种使用静态图像的“静态”诊断算法。ME 可以实时可视化黏膜下上皮内微血管内的红细胞流动。在这里,我们评估了将 MV 血流速率与 ME 结合用于诊断 EGC 的效用,这是一项回顾性研究。
10 例分化型 EGC 患者(n=10)或斑片状发红患者(n=10)接受蓝色激光成像 ME 检查。通过对蓝色激光成像视频的 ME 分割图像,计算 EGC、斑片状发红和背景黏膜的平均 MV 血流率,用一个标记红细胞的平均运动距离来计算。我们比较了 EGC、斑片状发红和背景黏膜之间的平均 MV 血流率,还计算了 EGC 和斑片状发红之间的 MV 血流成像比(病变内/背景黏膜)。
EGC 的平均 MV 血流率(1481 μm/s;范围 1057-1762)明显低于斑片状发红(3859 μm/s;2435-5899)或背景黏膜(4140.6 μm/s;2820-6247)(P<0.01)。EGC 的 MV 血流成像比(0.39;0.27-0.62)明显低于斑片状发红(0.90;0.78-1.1)(P<0.01)。
使用 ME 进行 MV 血流率的动态诊断可能有助于 EGC 和斑片状发红的鉴别诊断。对胃黏膜内动态过程的内镜评估可能有助于 EGC 的诊断。