Suppr超能文献

切除术后胰腺腺癌患者辅助化疗治疗的真实世界模式。

Real-world patterns of adjuvant chemotherapy treatment for patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1Z2, Canada.

出版信息

Med Oncol. 2021 Feb 3;38(2):18. doi: 10.1007/s12032-021-01469-y.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to analyze the real-world treatment patterns of adjuvant chemotherapy administration among patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cases with non-metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, diagnosed 2007-2018, treated with upfront surgical resection, and recorded within Alberta Cancer registry were accessed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate factors predicting use of adjuvant chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and multivariable Cox regression analysis were used to compare overall survival among patients treated with adjuvant gemcitabine versus those treated with adjuvant gemcitabine + capecitabine. A total of 695 patients who have undergone upfront surgical treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, including 445 patients (64%) who received adjuvant chemotherapy and 250 patients (36%) who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. The following factors were associated with lower probability to receive adjuvant chemotherapy: older age (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.93-0.96), node negativity (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.33-0.67), higher Charlson comorbidity index (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.74-0.99), and living within the Northern zone of the province (OR for Calgary zone versus North zone: 2.24; 95% CI 1.29-3.90). Within patients who received adjuvant gemcitabine ± capecitabine, factors associated with worse overall survival included higher Charlson comorbidity index (HR 1.18; 95% CI 1.00-1.40), and node-positive disease (HR for node-negative versus node-positive disease: 0.51; 95% CI 0.33-0.78). Type of chemotherapy was not predictive of overall survival (HR for gemcitabine versus gemcitabine plus capecitabine: 1.40; 95% CI 0.98-2.00). P value for interaction between type of chemotherapy and nodal status was 0.038. In this real-world study, the added benefit of adjuvant gemcitabine + capecitabine (compared to adjuvant gemcitabine) seems to be limited to patients with node-positive disease.

摘要

本研究旨在分析接受胰腺腺癌切除术患者辅助化疗的实际治疗模式。我们获取了 2007 年至 2018 年间在艾伯塔癌症登记处记录的诊断为非转移性胰腺腺癌、接受初始手术切除并接受治疗的病例。采用多变量逻辑回归分析评估预测辅助化疗使用的因素。使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存估计和多变量 Cox 回归分析比较接受吉西他滨辅助治疗和接受吉西他滨+卡培他滨辅助治疗的患者的总生存率。共有 695 例患者接受了胰腺腺癌的初始手术治疗,其中 445 例(64%)患者接受了辅助化疗,250 例(36%)患者未接受辅助化疗。与接受辅助化疗的可能性较低相关的因素包括年龄较大(OR 0.94;95%CI 0.93-0.96)、淋巴结阴性(OR 0.47;95%CI 0.33-0.67)、Charlson 合并症指数较高(OR 0.86;95%CI 0.74-0.99)和居住在省内北部地区(与卡尔加里地区相比,艾伯塔省北部地区的 OR:2.24;95%CI 1.29-3.90)。在接受吉西他滨±卡培他滨辅助治疗的患者中,与总体生存率较差相关的因素包括较高的 Charlson 合并症指数(HR 1.18;95%CI 1.00-1.40)和淋巴结阳性疾病(与淋巴结阴性疾病相比的 HR:0.51;95%CI 0.33-0.78)。化疗类型不能预测总体生存率(吉西他滨与吉西他滨+卡培他滨的 HR:1.40;95%CI 0.98-2.00)。化疗类型和淋巴结状态之间交互作用的 P 值为 0.038。在这项真实世界研究中,与辅助吉西他滨相比,吉西他滨+卡培他滨(加用)的附加益处似乎仅限于淋巴结阳性疾病患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验