• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

父母和健康专业人员对管饲儿童混合喂养的经验和看法:定性系统评价方案。

Parents and health professionals' experiences and perceptions of blended feeding in tube-fed children: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

机构信息

School of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.

Trinity Centre for Practice and Healthcare Innovation, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland: A JBI Affiliated Group.

出版信息

JBI Evid Synth. 2021 Jul 1;19(7):1705-1712. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00230.

DOI:10.11124/JBIES-20-00230
PMID:33534291
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to identify and synthesize the best available evidence on parents' and health professionals' experiences and perceptions of blended feeding in tube-fed children in order to promote effective decision-making on its use.

INTRODUCTION

Blended feeding is not a new concept, despite the fact that commercial formulas have displaced its use in recent years. As feeding is viewed as an intimate experience between a parent and child, the choice of individualized blended feeds is something to be considered; however, professionals find there is a lack of evidence and discussion to support the use of blended feeding in practice. Therefore, the findings of this review may be beneficial, especially for professionals, and inform or promote more effective decision-making on the use of blended feeding.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

This review will consider studies that investigate parents and/or health professionals' experiences and perceptions of total or partial blended feeding in tube-fed children. Studies published in English that focus on qualitative data will be considered. There will be no restrictions on year or publication.

METHODS

The key information sources to be searched are: CINAHL Complete, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, WHO Library Database (GIM), and Google Scholar, along with several sources of gray literature. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts against the inclusion criteria, and will retrieve full text studies, assess methodological quality, and extract data. Findings will be pooled using meta aggregation, and a ConQual Summary of Findings will be presented.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO (CRD42020160357).

摘要

目的

本综述旨在识别和综合父母和卫生专业人员在管饲儿童中混合喂养的经验和看法的最佳可用证据,以促进对其使用的有效决策。

引言

尽管近年来商业配方已取代了其使用,但混合喂养并不是一个新概念。由于喂养被视为父母和孩子之间的亲密体验,因此需要考虑选择个体化的混合喂养;然而,专业人员发现缺乏证据和讨论来支持混合喂养的实际应用。因此,本综述的结果可能对专业人员有益,并为混合喂养的使用提供信息或促进更有效的决策。

纳入标准

本综述将考虑调查父母和/或卫生专业人员对管饲儿童进行全部或部分混合喂养的经验和看法的研究。将考虑发表在英语期刊上、重点为定性数据的研究。对发表年份和出版物没有限制。

方法

将搜索的主要信息来源包括:CINAHL Complete、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Embase、Web of Science、世界卫生组织图书馆数据库(GIM)和 Google Scholar,以及一些灰色文献来源。两名评审员将独立筛选标题和摘要,以确定是否符合纳入标准,并检索全文研究,评估方法学质量,并提取数据。使用荟萃聚合汇总结果,并呈现 ConQual 研究结果总结。

系统评价注册编号

PROSPERO(CRD42020160357)。

相似文献

1
Parents and health professionals' experiences and perceptions of blended feeding in tube-fed children: a qualitative systematic review protocol.父母和健康专业人员对管饲儿童混合喂养的经验和看法:定性系统评价方案。
JBI Evid Synth. 2021 Jul 1;19(7):1705-1712. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00230.
2
Parent and carer experiences of health care professionals' communication about childhood obesity: a qualitative systematic review protocol.家长和照顾者对医护人员就儿童肥胖问题进行沟通的体验:定性系统评价方案。
JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Feb 1;21(2):401-406. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00017.
3
Parental experiences of caring for their preschool children after declining vaccines: a qualitative systematic review protocol.父母在拒绝疫苗后照顾学龄前儿童的体验:一项定性系统评价研究方案。
JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Jan 1;20(1):196-203. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00116.
4
Healthcare users' experiences of communicating with healthcare professionals about children who have life-limiting conditions: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医疗保健使用者就患有危及生命疾病的儿童与医疗保健专业人员沟通的经历:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):33-42. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2413.
5
Experiences of parents and prospective parents when receiving a diagnosis of Down syndrome for their child in the perinatal period: a qualitative systematic review protocol.围产期孩子被诊断为唐氏综合征时父母及准父母的经历:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Dec 1;20(12):2995-3000. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00291.
6
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
7
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
8
Health literacy and parenting infants at home: protocol for a qualitative systematic review of parents' experiences.健康素养与家庭育儿:父母育儿经验的定性系统评价方案。
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Jan 1;22(1):90-96. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00017.
9
Experiences and perceptions of emergency department nurses regarding people who present with mental health issues: a systematic review protocol.急诊科护士对有心理健康问题患者的经验与看法:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 Sep;17(9):1877-1882. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-18-00004.
10
Experiences and perceptions of family members of emergency first responders with post-traumatic stress disorder: a qualitative systematic review.患有创伤后应激障碍的急救人员家庭成员的经历与认知:一项定性系统综述
JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Apr 1;21(4):629-668. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00433.