• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价不同撑开技术在原发性开放式鼻窦成形术中对鼻腔和嗅觉功能的影响。

Evaluation of the use of Different Spreader Techniques in Primary Open Septorinoplasty in Terms of Nasal and Olfactory Functions.

机构信息

Department Of Otolaryngology, Bülent Ecevit University Medical Faculty, Zonguldak.

Department Of Otolaryngology, Dişkapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Ankara.

出版信息

J Craniofac Surg. 2021 Sep 1;32(6):2016-2018. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007485.

DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000007485
PMID:33534329
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In this study, the authors aimed to investigate the use of spreader and determine the efficacy and superiority of different spreader techniques in septorhinoplasty in terms of nasal and olfactory functions.

METHODS

A total of 60 patients who had undergone septorhinoplasty with the open technique were included in the study. In addition to open septorhinoplasty, 20 patients also underwent bilateral spreader graft placement and 20 bilateral spreader flap placement. For the remaining 20 patients, open septorhinoplasty was performed without spreader grafts or flaps. The patients completed the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale consisting of five questions, and the Brief Smell Identification Test was used to detect olfactory dysfunction.

RESULTS

The preoperative mean NOSE score of all patients was 10.87 (1-18), while the postoperative mean value was 1.83 (0-10). The preoperative mean olfactory score was 6.23 ± 2.20 in all patients while it was 7.33 ± 1.75 postoperatively. There was a statistically significant difference between the preoperative and postoperative NOSE and olfactory scores in all patients, but no statistically significant difference was observed between the three groups.

CONCLUSION

Spreader graft or flap techniques used in septorhinoplasty are safe in terms of nasal obstruction and olfactory function, and there is no statistically significant difference between them.

摘要

背景

在这项研究中,作者旨在研究扩撑器的使用,并从鼻腔和嗅觉功能方面,评估不同扩撑技术在鼻中隔鼻整形术中的效果和优势。

方法

本研究共纳入 60 例接受开放式鼻中隔鼻整形术的患者。除了开放式鼻中隔鼻整形术外,20 例患者还接受双侧扩撑器移植,20 例患者接受双侧扩撑皮瓣移植。对于其余 20 例患者,采用开放式鼻中隔鼻整形术,不使用扩撑器移植或皮瓣。患者完成了由五个问题组成的鼻腔阻塞症状评估(NOSE)量表,并用简短嗅觉识别测试来检测嗅觉功能障碍。

结果

所有患者术前的平均 NOSE 评分为 10.87(1-18),术后平均评分为 1.83(0-10)。所有患者术前平均嗅觉评分为 6.23±2.20,术后平均评分为 7.33±1.75。所有患者的术前和术后 NOSE 及嗅觉评分均有统计学差异,但三组间无统计学差异。

结论

鼻中隔鼻整形术中使用扩撑器移植或皮瓣技术在缓解鼻腔阻塞和嗅觉功能方面是安全的,且它们之间无统计学差异。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the use of Different Spreader Techniques in Primary Open Septorinoplasty in Terms of Nasal and Olfactory Functions.评价不同撑开技术在原发性开放式鼻窦成形术中对鼻腔和嗅觉功能的影响。
J Craniofac Surg. 2021 Sep 1;32(6):2016-2018. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007485.
2
Evaluating the Effect of Spreader Grafting on Nasal Obstruction Using the NOSE Scale.使用鼻阻塞症状评估量表(NOSE量表)评估撑开移植术对鼻塞的疗效。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2017 Mar;126(3):219-223. doi: 10.1177/0003489416685320. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
3
Patient-Perceived Nasal Appearance After Septorhinoplasty With Spreader Versus Extended Spreader Graft.鼻中隔成形术后鼻中隔扩展移植物与鼻中隔延长移植物患者鼻外观感知的比较。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Apr;131(4):765-772. doi: 10.1002/lary.28974. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
4
Use of Spreader Flaps Without Dorsal Hump Reduction and the Effect on Nasal Function.不进行驼峰鼻矫正的撑开皮瓣的应用及其对鼻功能的影响。
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Jul 1;19(4):287-292. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.2057.
5
Analysis of Patient-Perceived Nasal Appearance Evaluations Following Functional Septorhinoplasty With Spreader Graft Placement.功能性鼻中隔成形术加鼻中隔扩张器置入术后患者对鼻部外观评估的分析。
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019 Jul 1;21(4):305-311. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2018.2118.
6
Effects of Spreader Grafts on Olfactory Function in Septorhinoplasty.鼻中隔成形术中撑开移植片对嗅觉功能的影响。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Feb;40(1):106-13. doi: 10.1007/s00266-015-0597-2. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
7
True and Average Internal Nasal Valve Area in Septorhinoplasty: Radiological and Clinical Outcomes.鼻中隔鼻成形术中真实和平均鼻内瓣膜面积:放射学和临床结果
Ann Plast Surg. 2020 May;84(5):487-493. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002212.
8
Assessment of Functional Outcomes of an Autospreader Flap and Spreader Graft in Rhinoplasty.评估鼻整形术中自动扩张瓣和扩张移植物的功能结果。
J Craniofac Surg. 2022 May 1;33(3):e257-e260. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008044.
9
Comparative Outcomes in Functional Rhinoplasty With Open vs Endonasal Spreader Graft Placement.开放式与鼻内放置撑开移植片功能性鼻整形术的比较结果
Ann Plast Surg. 2018 May;80(5):468-471. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001434.
10
Comparison of nasal functional outcomes of let down rhinoplasty and open technical rhinoplasty using spreader graft.采用鼻中隔扩展移植物的下鼻甲释放成形术与开放式技术鼻整形术的鼻功能结局比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Feb;278(2):371-377. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06270-7. Epub 2020 Aug 13.

引用本文的文献

1
The Safety and Efficacy of Spreader Grafts and Autospreaders in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.隆鼻术中扩张移植物和自动扩张器的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Aug;46(4):1741-1759. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02735-0. Epub 2022 Jan 14.