Suppr超能文献

院前使用纳洛酮后不转运与随后发生非致命性过量的风险增加相关。

Non-transport after Prehospital Naloxone Administration Is Associated with Higher Risk of Subsequent Non-fatal Overdose.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, UMMS-Baystate, Springfield, MA (AZ);; Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR (MRN);; Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of EMS, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (ANH);; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH (US);; Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of EMS, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH (JM).

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2022 Mar-Apr;26(2):272-279. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2021.1884324. Epub 2021 Feb 26.

Abstract

U.S. opioid overdoses increased nearly sixfold from 1999 to 2018, and greater than 1% of all emergency medical services (EMS) encounters now involve naloxone administration. While "treat and release" protocols may have low short-term mortality, the risk of subsequent non-fatal overdoses is not known. This study compares the risk of repeat overdose encounters between patients transported to an emergency department (ED) and those who refused transport after prehospital naloxone administration. All EMS charts within a large single-tier fire-based urban EMS system between January 1 and August 31, 2018 were reviewed if either naloxone administration or a clinical impression related to opioid overdose was documented. Charts were excluded if there was no documented evidence of an opioid toxidrome (respiratory depression or altered mental status), if there was another clear explanation for the symptoms (e.g., hypoglycemia), or if naloxone was not administered. Ten percent of charts were reviewed by a second author to assess reliability. Cox regression (survival analysis) was used to estimate the risk of a subsequent EMS encounter with naloxone administration following an index encounter with naloxone administration. Of the 2143 charts reviewed, 1311 unique patients with 1600 overdose encounters involving naloxone administration were identified. Inter-rater reliability for chart inclusion was strong [ = 0.83 (95% CI: 0.72-0.90)]. Police/bystanders administered naloxone in 208/1600 (13.0%) encounters. A substantial proportion of encounters resulted in transport refusal (674/1600, 42.1%). The final Cox model included only refusal vs. acceptance of transport to an ED during the index EMS encounter. Patient age, gender, and naloxone administration prior to EMS arrival were not statistically significant in univariate or multivariable analyses, nor were they significant confounders. Refusal of transport was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.66 (95% CI: 1.23-2.23) for subsequent EMS encounters with naloxone administration. Non-transport after prehospital naloxone administration is associated with an increased risk of subsequent non-fatal overdose requiring EMS intervention. Limitations include the use of a single EMS agency as patients may have had uncaptured overdose encounters in neighboring municipalities.

摘要

1999 年至 2018 年,美国阿片类药物过量使用增加了近 6 倍,超过 1%的紧急医疗服务(EMS)接触现在涉及纳洛酮的管理。虽然“治疗和释放”方案可能具有较低的短期死亡率,但随后非致命性过量的风险尚不清楚。本研究比较了在院前纳洛酮给药后被送往急诊科(ED)的患者和拒绝转运的患者之间再次出现过量用药的风险。如果记录了纳洛酮的给药或与阿片类药物过量有关的临床印象,那么在 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 8 月 31 日期间,对大型单层消防为基础的城市 EMS 系统内的所有 EMS 图表进行了审查。如果没有记录到阿片类药物中毒的证据(呼吸抑制或神志改变),或者症状有其他明确的解释(例如低血糖),或者没有给予纳洛酮,则排除了图表。10%的图表由第二位作者进行了审查,以评估可靠性。使用 Cox 回归(生存分析)来估计在指数纳洛酮给药后,与纳洛酮给药相关的随后的 EMS 接触的风险。在审查的 2143 份图表中,确定了 1311 名具有 1600 次涉及纳洛酮给药的过量用药的独特患者。图表纳入的观察者间可靠性较强 [ = 0.83 (95% CI: 0.72-0.90)]。警察/旁观者在 208/1600(13.0%)次接触中给予了纳洛酮。大量接触导致转运拒绝(674/1600,42.1%)。最终的 Cox 模型仅包括在指数 EMS 接触期间拒绝或接受转运至 ED。患者年龄、性别和 EMS 到达前的纳洛酮给药在单变量或多变量分析中均无统计学意义,也不是混杂因素。与接受转运相比,拒绝转运与随后需要 EMS 干预的纳洛酮给药的 EMS 接触的风险比为 1.66(95% CI: 1.23-2.23)。院前纳洛酮给药后不转运与随后非致命性过量需要 EMS 干预的风险增加相关。局限性包括使用单个 EMS 机构,因为患者可能在邻近的自治市发生未捕获的过量接触。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验