Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, 301 Wilson Hall, 111 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
J Affect Disord. 2021 Mar 15;283:101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.204. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
Although an attentional bias for threat is implicated in anxiety disorders, such a bias has not been consistently observed in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). This inconsistency is partially due to a paucity of studies employing robust attentional tasks. The emotional attentional blink (EAB), a phenomenon in which the brief appearance of a task-irrelevant, emotionally arousing image captures attention to such an extent that target stimuli cannot be detected, have increasing been employed as more robust tasks of attentional biases.
In the present study, patients with OCD (n = 23) and controls (n = 24) completed an EAB paradigm that required searching for a target embedded within a series of rapidly presented images. Critically, a fear, disgust, positive, or neutral distracter image appeared 200 ms or 800 ms before the target (i.e., lag 2 and lag 8).
Although accuracy was significantly reduced for control participants when emotionally arousing images served as distractors compare to neutral images at lag 2 (but not at lag 8), no statistically significant differences in accuracy were observed between emotionally arousing images and neutral images among those with OCD. Subsequent analysis did show that OCD symptoms across all participants was significantly correlated with difficulty disengaging from emotionally arousing, but not neutral, images.
Relatively small sample size and absence of personally-relevant threatening stimuli.
The reduced attentional capture by emotionally arousing images in OCD, relative to neutral images neutral, may suggest inefficient engagement and disengagement of attentional networks.
尽管注意力对威胁的偏向与焦虑症有关,但在强迫症(OCD)中并未一致观察到这种偏向。这种不一致部分归因于缺乏使用强大注意力任务的研究。情绪注意瞬脱(EAB)是一种现象,即短暂出现与任务无关的、情绪上令人兴奋的图像会吸引注意力,以至于无法检测到目标刺激。越来越多的研究使用这种更强大的注意力偏向任务。
在本研究中,OCD 患者(n=23)和对照组(n=24)完成了 EAB 范式,该范式要求在快速呈现的一系列图像中搜索目标。关键是,在目标(即滞后 2 和滞后 8)之前 200 毫秒或 800 毫秒出现恐惧、厌恶、积极或中性的分心图像。
尽管当情绪激动的图像作为分心物时,对照组的准确性明显低于中性图像(但在滞后 8 时则没有),但在 OCD 患者中,情绪激动的图像与中性图像之间的准确性没有统计学上的显著差异。随后的分析确实表明,所有参与者的 OCD 症状与从情绪激动的图像(而非中性图像)中难以分心的难度显著相关。
样本量相对较小,且缺乏与个人相关的威胁性刺激。
与中性图像相比,OCD 中情绪激动的图像对注意力的捕获减少,这可能表明注意力网络的参与和脱离效率低下。