Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.
Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France.
Dermatology. 2021;237(3):338-346. doi: 10.1159/000513398. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
Obesity is associated with an increased risk of psoriasis.
In this study, we examined whether body mass index (BMI) is taken into account when choosing first-line biologic therapy for psoriasis.
In this cohort study, we compared obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) and non-obese patients for the first-line biologic therapy prescribed, its survival, reasons for discontinuation, therapy optimization, co-prescription of methotrexate and factors associated with long drug survival.
A total of 931 patients were included: 594 (64%) were male, median age was 46 years (interquartile range 36-56). The most-prescribed biologic agents as first-line treatment were adalimumab (ADA; 42.7%), ustekinumab (UST; 29.9%) and etanercept (ETA; 22.9%); only frequency of infliximab (IFX) prescription differed between groups. Drug survival was significantly shorter for obese than non-obese patients (p < 2.10-4) and was worse for obese than non-obese patients for UST (p = 0.009) and ETA (p = 0.02), with no difference for ADA (p = 0.11). The main reason for discontinuation was primary inefficacy (62%), which was more frequent in obese than non-obese patients. The cumulative incidence of optimization did not significantly differ between the groups, except for ADA (SHR 1.91, 95% CI [1.23-2.96], p = 0.005). On multivariate analysis, risk of discontinuation was associated with only ETA as first-line biologic therapy (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.04-2.19).
This study highlighted the lack of difference in prescription of first-line biologic treatment, except for IFX, between obese and non-obese patients presenting moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Drug survival in obese patients is shorter, mainly because of inefficacy, than in non-obese patients. This highlights the need for targeted pharmacological studies in obese individuals to find optimal administration schemes.
肥胖与银屑病风险增加相关。
本研究旨在探讨在选择银屑病的一线生物疗法时是否考虑了体重指数(BMI)。
在这项队列研究中,我们比较了肥胖(BMI≥30kg/m2)和非肥胖患者的一线生物疗法的处方、其生存率、停药原因、治疗优化、甲氨蝶呤的联合处方以及与药物长期生存相关的因素。
共纳入 931 例患者:594 例(64%)为男性,中位年龄为 46 岁(四分位间距 36-56 岁)。作为一线治疗最常处方的生物制剂分别为阿达木单抗(ADA;42.7%)、乌司奴单抗(UST;29.9%)和依那西普(ETA;22.9%);仅英夫利昔单抗(IFX)的处方频率在组间存在差异。肥胖患者的药物生存时间明显短于非肥胖患者(p<2.10-4),且 UST(p=0.009)和 ETA(p=0.02)的药物生存时间也差于非肥胖患者,而 ADA(p=0.11)则无差异。停药的主要原因是原发性疗效不佳(62%),肥胖患者比非肥胖患者更常见。除 ADA 外(SHR 1.91,95%CI[1.23-2.96],p=0.005),两组之间的优化累积发生率无显著差异。多变量分析显示,只有作为一线生物疗法的 ETA 与停药风险相关(HR 1.51,95%CI 1.04-2.19)。
本研究强调,在中度至重度银屑病患者中,肥胖患者与非肥胖患者在一线生物治疗的处方方面除 IFX 外,并无差异。肥胖患者的药物生存时间较短,主要是因为疗效不佳,而非肥胖患者。这凸显了在肥胖个体中开展靶向药理学研究以寻找最佳给药方案的必要性。