Suppr超能文献

层流空气系统会影响围手术期体温过低的发生吗?一项随机临床试验。

Does the Laminar Airflow System Affect the Development of Perioperative Hypothermia? A Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Dagli Recai, Çelik Fatma, Özden Hüseyin, Şahin Serdar

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Kirsehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kirsehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

出版信息

HERD. 2021 Jul;14(3):202-214. doi: 10.1177/1937586720985859. Epub 2021 Feb 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare tympanic membrane temperature changes and the incidence of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia (IPH) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia in laminar airflow systems (LAS-OR) and conventional turbulent airflow systems (CAS-OR).

BACKGROUND

Different heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems are used in the operating room (OR), such as LAS and CAS. Laminar airflow is directed directly to the patient in LAS-OR. Does laminar airflow in ORs cause faster heat loss by convection?

METHODS

This is a prospective, randomized study. We divided 200 patients with simple randomization (1:1), as group LAS and group CAS, and took the patients into the LAS-OR or CAS-OR for the operation. Clinical trial number: IRCT20180324039145N3. The tympanic membrane temperatures of patients were measured (°C) before anesthesia induction () and then every 15 min during surgery (). Changes (Δ) between and were measured.

RESULTS

In the first 30 min, there was a temperature decrease of approximately 0.8 °C (1.44 °F) in both groups. Temperature decreases at 45 min were higher in group LAS than in group CAS but not statistically significant, Δ, respectively, 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] [0.77, 1.02]) versus 0.77 (95% CI [0.69, 0.84]; = .09). IPH occurred in a total of 60.9% (112 of 184) of patients in the entire surgical evaluation period in group LAS and group CAS (58.9% vs. 62.8%, = . 59).

CONCLUSIONS

IPH is seen frequently in both HVAC systems. Clinically, the advantage of HVAC systems relative to each other has not been demonstrated during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

摘要

目的

我们旨在比较在层流气流系统(LAS-OR)和传统紊流气流系统(CAS-OR)下接受全身麻醉的腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的鼓膜温度变化及围手术期意外低温(IPH)的发生率。

背景

手术室(OR)使用不同的加热、通风和空调(HVAC)系统,如LAS和CAS。在LAS-OR中,层流气流直接导向患者。手术室中的层流气流会通过对流导致更快的热量散失吗?

方法

这是一项前瞻性随机研究。我们将200例患者简单随机分为两组(1:1),即LAS组和CAS组,并将患者带入LAS-OR或CAS-OR进行手术。临床试验编号:IRCT20180324039145N3。在麻醉诱导前()测量患者的鼓膜温度(°C),然后在手术期间每15分钟测量一次()。测量和之间的变化(Δ)。

结果

在最初30分钟内,两组的温度均下降约0.8°C(1.44°F)。LAS组在45分钟时的温度下降高于CAS组,但差异无统计学意义,Δ分别为0.89(95%置信区间[CI][0.77,1.02])和0.77(95%CI[0.69,0.84];=0.09)。在整个手术评估期内,LAS组和CAS组共有60.9%(184例中的112例)的患者发生IPH(58.9%对62.8%,=0.59)。

结论

在两种HVAC系统中,IPH均常见。临床上,在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中尚未证明HVAC系统相对于彼此的优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验