Suppr超能文献

三种自动降钙素原免疫分析法在医学决策点的一致性。

Concordance of Three Automated Procalcitonin Immunoassays at Medical Decision Points.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Laboratory Medicine Research Institute of Bacterial Resistance, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Lab Med. 2021 Jul 1;41(4):419-423. doi: 10.3343/alm.2021.41.4.419.

Abstract

Procalcitonin (PCT) is a useful bacterial infection biomarker with the potential for guiding antibiotic therapy. We evaluated the concordance of three automated PCT immunoassays: Kryptor (BRAHMS GmbH, Hennigsdorf, Germany), Atellica IM 1600 (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Munich, Germany), and Cobas e801 (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). In 119 serum samples with a PCT concentration <5.00 μg/L, Kryptor (reference assay) was compared with the other two immunoassays by Spearman's rank correlation, regression analysis, and concordance at two antibiotic stewardship medical decision points: 0.25 and 0.50 μg/L. The Atellica IM 1600 and Cobas e801 results showed high correlations with those of Kryptor, with correlation coefficient (ρ) values of 0.97 and 0.99, respectively. However, negative biases were observed in both immunoassays (slope/y-intercept: 0.75/-0.00 for Atellica IM 1600; 0.88/-0.01 for Cobas e801). Atellica IM 1600 and Cobas e801 demonstrated excellent concordance with Kryptor at both medical decision points, with linearly weighted κ values of 0.90 and 0.92, respectively, despite discrepancies, which were more prominent at the 0.25 μg/L medical decision point. Based on these biases and discrepancies, the alternate use of different PCT immunoassays in repeat examinations is inadvisable. Standardization is required before comparing the results of different PCT immunoassays.

摘要

降钙素原 (PCT) 是一种有用的细菌感染生物标志物,具有指导抗生素治疗的潜力。我们评估了三种自动化 PCT 免疫分析:Kryptor(BRAHMS GmbH,德国亨尼希多夫)、Atellica IM 1600(西门子医疗诊断,德国慕尼黑)和 Cobas e801(罗氏诊断,德国曼海姆)。在 119 份 PCT 浓度<5.00μg/L 的血清样本中,Kryptor(参考检测)与另外两种免疫分析通过 Spearman 秩相关、回归分析和两个抗生素管理医学决策点(0.25μg/L 和 0.50μg/L)的一致性进行比较。Atellica IM 1600 和 Cobas e801 的结果与 Kryptor 高度相关,相关系数(ρ)值分别为 0.97 和 0.99。然而,在两种免疫分析中均观察到负偏倚(斜率/截距:0.75/-0.00 用于 Atellica IM 1600;0.88/-0.01 用于 Cobas e801)。Atellica IM 1600 和 Cobas e801 在两个医学决策点与 Kryptor 表现出极好的一致性,线性加权 κ 值分别为 0.90 和 0.92,尽管存在差异,在 0.25μg/L 医学决策点更为明显。基于这些偏差和差异,不建议在重复检查中交替使用不同的 PCT 免疫分析。在比较不同 PCT 免疫分析的结果之前,需要进行标准化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5e4/7884194/7c6a07f6f63b/alm-41-4-419-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验