• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种自动降钙素原免疫分析法在医学决策点的一致性。

Concordance of Three Automated Procalcitonin Immunoassays at Medical Decision Points.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Laboratory Medicine Research Institute of Bacterial Resistance, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Lab Med. 2021 Jul 1;41(4):419-423. doi: 10.3343/alm.2021.41.4.419.

DOI:10.3343/alm.2021.41.4.419
PMID:33536362
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7884194/
Abstract

Procalcitonin (PCT) is a useful bacterial infection biomarker with the potential for guiding antibiotic therapy. We evaluated the concordance of three automated PCT immunoassays: Kryptor (BRAHMS GmbH, Hennigsdorf, Germany), Atellica IM 1600 (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Munich, Germany), and Cobas e801 (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). In 119 serum samples with a PCT concentration <5.00 μg/L, Kryptor (reference assay) was compared with the other two immunoassays by Spearman's rank correlation, regression analysis, and concordance at two antibiotic stewardship medical decision points: 0.25 and 0.50 μg/L. The Atellica IM 1600 and Cobas e801 results showed high correlations with those of Kryptor, with correlation coefficient (ρ) values of 0.97 and 0.99, respectively. However, negative biases were observed in both immunoassays (slope/y-intercept: 0.75/-0.00 for Atellica IM 1600; 0.88/-0.01 for Cobas e801). Atellica IM 1600 and Cobas e801 demonstrated excellent concordance with Kryptor at both medical decision points, with linearly weighted κ values of 0.90 and 0.92, respectively, despite discrepancies, which were more prominent at the 0.25 μg/L medical decision point. Based on these biases and discrepancies, the alternate use of different PCT immunoassays in repeat examinations is inadvisable. Standardization is required before comparing the results of different PCT immunoassays.

摘要

降钙素原 (PCT) 是一种有用的细菌感染生物标志物,具有指导抗生素治疗的潜力。我们评估了三种自动化 PCT 免疫分析:Kryptor(BRAHMS GmbH,德国亨尼希多夫)、Atellica IM 1600(西门子医疗诊断,德国慕尼黑)和 Cobas e801(罗氏诊断,德国曼海姆)。在 119 份 PCT 浓度<5.00μg/L 的血清样本中,Kryptor(参考检测)与另外两种免疫分析通过 Spearman 秩相关、回归分析和两个抗生素管理医学决策点(0.25μg/L 和 0.50μg/L)的一致性进行比较。Atellica IM 1600 和 Cobas e801 的结果与 Kryptor 高度相关,相关系数(ρ)值分别为 0.97 和 0.99。然而,在两种免疫分析中均观察到负偏倚(斜率/截距:0.75/-0.00 用于 Atellica IM 1600;0.88/-0.01 用于 Cobas e801)。Atellica IM 1600 和 Cobas e801 在两个医学决策点与 Kryptor 表现出极好的一致性,线性加权 κ 值分别为 0.90 和 0.92,尽管存在差异,在 0.25μg/L 医学决策点更为明显。基于这些偏差和差异,不建议在重复检查中交替使用不同的 PCT 免疫分析。在比较不同 PCT 免疫分析的结果之前,需要进行标准化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5e4/7884194/7c6a07f6f63b/alm-41-4-419-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5e4/7884194/7c6a07f6f63b/alm-41-4-419-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5e4/7884194/7c6a07f6f63b/alm-41-4-419-f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Concordance of Three Automated Procalcitonin Immunoassays at Medical Decision Points.三种自动降钙素原免疫分析法在医学决策点的一致性。
Ann Lab Med. 2021 Jul 1;41(4):419-423. doi: 10.3343/alm.2021.41.4.419.
2
Two-center comparison of 10 fully-automated commercial procalcitonin (PCT) immunoassays.十项全自动商业降钙素原(PCT)免疫分析的双中心比较。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019 Dec 18;58(1):77-84. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2019-0888.
3
Evaluation of procalcitonin immunoassay concordance near clinical decision points.评价降钙素原免疫检测在临床决策点附近的一致性。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019 Aug 27;57(9):1414-1421. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2018-1362.
4
Multicenter comparison of automated procalcitonin immunoassays.降钙素原自动免疫测定法的多中心比较
Pract Lab Med. 2015 Jul 17;2:22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2015.07.001. eCollection 2015 Aug 1.
5
Comparison of the Siemens Atellica BRAHMS and the Abbott Architect BRAHMS Procalcitonin Assays.西门子 Atellica BRAHMS 与雅培 Architect BRAHMS 降钙素原检测试剂盒的比较。
Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2021 Mar;51(2):241-244.
6
Analytical evaluation of the novel VITROS BRAHMS procalcitonin immunoassay.新型VITROS BRAHMS降钙素原免疫测定法的分析评估。
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2020 Nov;80(7):541-545. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2020.1804071. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
7
Analytical evaluation of the performances of Diazyme and BRAHMS procalcitonin applied to Roche Cobas in comparison with BRAHMS PCT-sensitive Kryptor.与BRAHMS PCT敏感型Kryptor相比,对应用于罗氏Cobas的Diazyme和BRAHMS降钙素原检测性能的分析评估。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Nov 27;56(1):162-169. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0159.
8
A new sensitive automated assay for procalcitonin detection: LIAISON BRAHMS PCT II GEN.一种用于降钙素原检测的新型灵敏自动化检测方法:LIAISON BRAHMS PCT II GEN。
Pract Lab Med. 2016 Jun 27;6:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2016.06.002. eCollection 2016 Dec 1.
9
Comparison of a novel automated DiaSys procalcitonin immunoassay with four different BRAHMS-partnered immunoassays.一种新型自动化DiaSys降钙素原免疫测定法与四种不同的BRAHMS合作免疫测定法的比较。
Pract Lab Med. 2022 Apr 12;30:e00274. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2022.e00274. eCollection 2022 May.
10
Analytical and clinical performance of the Advansure i3 procalcitonin assay.Advansure i3 降钙素原检测试剂的分析及临床性能。
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2021 Nov;81(7):546-551. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2021.1969592. Epub 2021 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Circulating Biomarkers in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: Bridging Laboratory Complexities and Clinical Application Through Algorithm Design.甲状腺髓样癌中的循环生物标志物:通过算法设计弥合实验室复杂性与临床应用之间的差距
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 9;14(16):5645. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165645.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of kidney function with effectiveness of procalcitonin-guided antibiotic treatment: a patient-level meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials.肾功能与降钙素原指导抗生素治疗效果的关系:一项来自随机对照试验的患者水平荟萃分析。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Sep 28;59(2):441-453. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0931.
2
Analytical Evaluation of the New Beckman Coulter Access Procalcitonin (PCT) Chemiluminescent Immunoassay.新型贝克曼库尔特Access降钙素原(PCT)化学发光免疫分析的分析评估
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Feb 26;10(3):128. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10030128.
3
Method Verification Shows a Negative Bias between 2 Procalcitonin Methods at Medical Decision Concentrations.
方法验证显示,在医学决策浓度下,两种降钙素原检测方法之间存在负偏差。
J Appl Lab Med. 2019 Jul;4(1):69-77. doi: 10.1373/jalm.2018.028449. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
4
Two-center comparison of 10 fully-automated commercial procalcitonin (PCT) immunoassays.十项全自动商业降钙素原(PCT)免疫分析的双中心比较。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019 Dec 18;58(1):77-84. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2019-0888.
5
Evaluation of procalcitonin immunoassay concordance near clinical decision points.评价降钙素原免疫检测在临床决策点附近的一致性。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019 Aug 27;57(9):1414-1421. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2018-1362.
6
Procalcitonin (PCT)-guided antibiotic stewardship: an international experts consensus on optimized clinical use.降钙素原 (PCT) 指导下的抗生素管理:优化临床应用的国际专家共识。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019 Aug 27;57(9):1308-1318. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2018-1181.
7
Comparison of the novel ARCHITECT procalcitonin assay with established procalcitonin assay systems.新型ARCHITECT降钙素原检测法与已确立的降钙素原检测系统的比较。
Pract Lab Med. 2018 Nov 9;12:e00110. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2018.e00110. eCollection 2018 Nov.
8
Differences in procalcitonin measurements between three BRAHMS-partnered immunoassays (Liaison, Elecsys and Architect).三种与BRAHMS合作的免疫测定法(Liaison、Elecsys和Architect)在降钙素原测量方面的差异。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019 Aug 27;57(9):e207-e210. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2018-0916.
9
Clinical Utility and Measurement of Procalcitonin.降钙素原的临床应用与检测
Clin Biochem Rev. 2017 Apr;38(2):59-68.
10
Effect of procalcitonin-guided antibiotic treatment on mortality in acute respiratory infections: a patient level meta-analysis.降钙素原指导抗生素治疗对急性呼吸道感染患者死亡率的影响:一项患者水平的荟萃分析。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Jan;18(1):95-107. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30592-3. Epub 2017 Oct 13.