Trevisiol Chiara, Cani Ilaria, Fabricio Aline S C, Gion Massimo, Giometto Bruno, De Massis Patrizia
Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Padua, Italy.
Department of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Front Neurol. 2021 Jan 18;11:607553. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.607553. eCollection 2020.
Algorithms for the detection of a malignancy in patients with unclear neurologic symptoms of suspicious paraneoplastic origins are not universally applied. Frequently, circulating tumor markers (TMs) are considered a valuable tool for cancer diagnosis in patients with paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNS). Our aim was to extract the recommendations on the use of TMs and onconeural antibodies (Abs) for the diagnosis of malignancies in PNS from clinical practice guidelines and put them forward as evidence in a common framework to facilitate diffusion, dissemination, and implementation. Systematic literature searches were performed for guidelines on both oncology and PNS published since 2007. Guidelines containing information and recommendations for clinical practice pertaining to the screening and diagnosis of PNS were selected. Information on circulating TMs and onconeural Abs was extracted and synthesized in consecutive steps of increasing simplification. We retrieved 799 eligible guidelines on oncology for the potential presence of information on PNS but only six covered treated diagnosis or the screening of cancer in PNS, which were then selected. Seventy-nine potentially relevant guidelines on PNS were identified as eligible and 15 were selected. Synoptic tables were prepared showing that classical TMs are not recommended for the screening or the diagnosis of a malignancy in patients with a suspected PNS. Neither should onconeural Abs be considered to screen for the presence of a malignancy, although they could be helpful to define the probability of the paraneoplastic origin of a neurologic disorder. The present work of synthesis may be a useful tool in the diffusion, dissemination, and implementation of guideline recommendations, potentially facilitating the decrease of the inappropriate use of circulating biomarkers for cancer screening in the presence of PNS.
用于检测具有可疑副肿瘤起源的不明神经系统症状患者恶性肿瘤的算法尚未得到普遍应用。通常,循环肿瘤标志物(TMs)被认为是副肿瘤性神经系统综合征(PNS)患者癌症诊断的重要工具。我们的目的是从临床实践指南中提取关于使用TMs和肿瘤神经抗体(Abs)诊断PNS中恶性肿瘤的建议,并将其作为证据呈现于一个通用框架中,以促进传播、推广和实施。自2007年以来,我们对肿瘤学和PNS的指南进行了系统的文献检索。选择了包含与PNS筛查和诊断相关临床实践信息和建议的指南。关于循环TMs和肿瘤神经Abs的信息在逐步简化的连续步骤中被提取和综合。我们检索到799条关于肿瘤学的合格指南,以查找其中关于PNS的潜在信息,但只有六条涵盖了PNS中癌症的治疗诊断或筛查,随后将其选中。确定了79条关于PNS的潜在相关指南为合格,其中15条被选中。编制了综述表,结果显示不建议使用经典TMs对疑似PNS患者进行恶性肿瘤筛查或诊断。肿瘤神经Abs也不应被视为筛查恶性肿瘤的存在,尽管它们可能有助于确定神经系统疾病副肿瘤起源的可能性。目前的综合工作可能是传播、推广和实施指南建议的有用工具,有可能在存在PNS的情况下减少循环生物标志物在癌症筛查中的不当使用。