First Department of Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Department of Internal Medicine, Oberndorf Hospital, Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Postgrad Med. 2021 Apr;133(3):291-298. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2021.1885945. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
: The detection of anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMA) is considered a hallmark in diagnosing primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). The most important AMA-subtype is AMA-M2 directed against the E2-subunit of pyruvate dehydrogenase. It is common clinical interpretation that lack of M2 due to immunoblotting (IB) indicates absence of specific auto-reactivity. We aimed to define whether M2-IB confirmation is linked to clinical outcomes.: Our cohort comprised 302 patients who tested positive for AMA with indirect immunofluorescence between 2006 and 2015. One hundred and eighty-four subjects (60.9%; male n = 29 [15.8%]) were tested M2-positive by confirmatory IB, whereas 118 subjects were IB-M2-negative (39.1%; male n = 25 [21.2%]). The natural history of 236 patients (78.1%) was evaluated by clinical follow-up (FU) assessing causes of death, leading health condition and response to PBC standard therapy if applicable.: Mean time to FU was 6.8 years. Twenty-eight M2-positive patients (15.2% of 184) and 28 M2-negative patients (23.7% of 118) had died (p = 0.0958). Thirty-four M2-positives (18.5%) and 32 M2-negatives (27.1%) were not available for FU. According to the clinical course by the time of FU, subjects were allocated to one of four groups: a) 34 patients had known PBC with n = 16 having an adequate and 18 an inadequate treatment response, b) 1 de novo PBC was detected, c) 13 were AMA-positive without biochemical evidence of PBC and d) 9 subjects were tested AMA-negative at FU. These numbers were comparable to M2-positive subjects with similar long-term clinical outcome.: Our data suggest that the clinical value of confirmatory M2 immunoblotting in the diagnostic routine of PBC is overestimated as the clinical course appears not to be related to the test result.
抗线粒体抗体(AMA)的检测被认为是诊断原发性胆汁性胆管炎(PBC)的标志。最重要的 AMA 亚型是针对丙酮酸脱氢酶 E2 亚单位的 AMA-M2。通常的临床解释是,由于免疫印迹(IB)缺乏 M2 表明不存在特异性自身反应。我们旨在确定 M2-IB 确认是否与临床结果相关。
我们的队列包括 302 名在 2006 年至 2015 年间间接免疫荧光检测 AMA 阳性的患者。184 名患者(60.9%;男性 n = 29 [15.8%])通过确认性 IB 检测为 M2 阳性,而 118 名患者为 IB-M2 阴性(39.1%;男性 n = 25 [21.2%])。通过临床随访(FU)评估 236 名患者(78.1%)的自然病史,评估死亡原因、主要健康状况以及是否适用 PBC 标准治疗的反应。
FU 的平均时间为 6.8 年。28 名 M2 阳性患者(184 名中的 15.2%)和 28 名 M2 阴性患者(118 名中的 23.7%)死亡(p = 0.0958)。34 名 M2 阳性(18.5%)和 32 名 M2 阴性(27.1%)无法进行 FU。根据 FU 时的临床病程,将患者分为以下四组:a)34 名患者已知患有 PBC,其中 16 名患者治疗反应充分,18 名患者治疗反应不充分,b)发现 1 例新的 PBC,c)13 名患者 AMA 阳性但无 PBC 的生化证据,d)9 名患者 FU 时 AMA 阴性。这些数字与 M2 阳性患者相似,具有相似的长期临床结局。
我们的数据表明,在 PBC 的诊断常规中,确认性 M2 免疫印迹的临床价值被高估,因为临床病程似乎与检测结果无关。