Suppr超能文献

T4N0、T1-2N1 和 T3N1 结肠癌患者辅助化疗中的分期悖论和差异。

Staging Paradox and Discrepancy in Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with T4N0, T1-2N1, and T3N1 Colon Cancer.

机构信息

Division of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2021 May;45(5):1561-1568. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-05973-0. Epub 2021 Feb 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A survival paradox between T4N0 (stage IIB/C) and T3N1 (stage IIIB) colon cancer has been rarely reported. The indication and regimen of adjuvant chemotherapy are separately described in the guidelines. This study aimed to elucidate the prognostic factors and investigate proper adjuvant treatment in colon cancer patients at these stages.

METHODS

Patients who underwent R0 resection for pathological T4N0 (n = 49), T1-2N1 (n = 31), or T3N1 (n = 82) colon cancer between 2008 and 2016 at a single institute were retrospectively reviewed. The clinicopathological characteristics, status of adjuvant chemotherapy, and oncologic outcomes of patients with T4N0 tumors were compared with those of patients with T1-2N1 and T3N1 tumors.

RESULTS

The biological characteristics of T4N0 tumors were more aggressive compared with the characteristics of T1-2N1 tumors and were similar to those of T3N1 tumors. The usage rate of oxaliplatin as an adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly lower in T4N0 patients than in T1-2N1 and T3N1 patients. The rate of local recurrence was the highest in patients with T4N0 tumors, and the survival outcomes for patients with T4N0 tumors were significantly worse compared with those of T1-2N1 patients and were similar to those of T3N1 patients. A multivariate analysis revealed that lack of adequate use of oxaliplatin for adjuvant chemotherapy was the only prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

T4N0 colon cancer had similar oncological characteristics and survival outcomes to T3N1 colon cancer. Systematic adjuvant chemotherapy, including oxaliplatin, should be incorporated into the therapy for T4N0 patients as well as T3N1 patients.

摘要

背景

T4N0(IIB/C 期)和 T3N1(IIIB 期)结肠癌之间存在生存悖论,这一现象很少有报道。指南分别描述了辅助化疗的适应证和方案。本研究旨在阐明这些分期结肠癌患者的预后因素,并探讨合适的辅助治疗方法。

方法

回顾性分析 2008 年至 2016 年期间在一家单中心接受 R0 切除的病理 T4N0(n=49)、T1-2N1(n=31)或 T3N1(n=82)结肠癌患者的临床病理特征、辅助化疗情况和肿瘤学结局。比较 T4N0 肿瘤患者与 T1-2N1 肿瘤和 T3N1 肿瘤患者的临床病理特征、辅助化疗情况和肿瘤学结局。

结果

与 T1-2N1 肿瘤相比,T4N0 肿瘤的生物学特征更为侵袭性,与 T3N1 肿瘤相似。T4N0 患者接受奥沙利铂辅助化疗的使用率明显低于 T1-2N1 和 T3N1 患者。T4N0 肿瘤患者局部复发率最高,T4N0 肿瘤患者的生存结局明显差于 T1-2N1 患者,与 T3N1 患者相似。多因素分析显示,辅助化疗中奥沙利铂使用不足是唯一的预后因素。

结论

T4N0 结肠癌具有与 T3N1 结肠癌相似的肿瘤学特征和生存结局。系统的辅助化疗,包括奥沙利铂,应纳入 T4N0 患者和 T3N1 患者的治疗中。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验