Department of Neurosurgery, Bundang CHA Medical Center, CHA University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Institute Department of Biomedical Science, College of Life Science, CHA University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 4;16(2):e0244325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244325. eCollection 2021.
The importance of maximal resection in the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) has been reported in many studies, but maximal resection of thalamic GBM is rarely attempted due to high rate of morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of surgical resection in adult thalamic glioblastoma (GBM) treatment and to identify the surgical technique of maximal safety resection. In case of suspected thalamic GBM, surgical resection is the treatment of choice in our hospital. Biopsy was considered when there was ventricle wall enhancement or multiple enhancement lesion in a distant location. Navigation magnetic resonance imaging, diffuse tensor tractography imaging, tailed bullets, and intraoperative computed tomography and neurophysiologic monitoring (transcranial motor evoked potential and direct subcortical stimulation) were used in all surgical resection cases. The surgical approach was selected on the basis of the location of the tumor epicenter and the adjacent corticospinal tract. Among the 42 patients, 19 and 23 patients underwent surgical resection and biopsy, respectively, according to treatment strategy criteria. As a result, the surgical resection group exhibited a good response with overall survival (OS) (median: 676 days, p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (median: 328 days, p < 0.001) compared with each biopsy groups (doctor selecting biopsy group, median OS: 240 days and median PFS: 134 days; patient selecting biopsy group, median OS: 212 days and median PFS: 118 days). The surgical resection groups displayed a better prognosis compared to that of the biopsy groups for both the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase unmethylated (log-rank p = 0.0035) or methylated groups (log-rank p = 0.021). Surgical resection was significantly associated with better prognosis (hazard ratio: 0.214, p = 0.006). In case of thalamic GBM without ventricle wall-enhancing lesion or multiple lesions, maximal surgical resection above 80% showed good clinical outcomes with prolonged the overall survival compared to biopsy. It is helpful to use adjuvant surgical techniques of checking intraoperative changes and select the appropriate surgical approach for reducing the surgical morbidity.
在许多研究中已经报道了最大程度切除在胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)治疗中的重要性,但由于发病率和死亡率高,很少尝试对丘脑 GBM 进行最大程度的切除。本研究的目的是探讨手术切除在成人丘脑胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)治疗中的作用,并确定最大安全切除的手术技术。在怀疑存在丘脑 GBM 的情况下,手术切除是我们医院的首选治疗方法。当存在脑室壁增强或远处存在多个增强病变时,考虑进行活检。所有手术切除病例均使用导航磁共振成像、弥散张量追踪成像、长尾子弹以及术中计算机断层扫描和神经生理监测(经颅运动诱发电位和直接皮质下刺激)。手术入路根据肿瘤中心点的位置和相邻皮质脊髓束的位置选择。在 42 名患者中,根据治疗策略标准,分别有 19 名和 23 名患者接受了手术切除和活检。结果,与每个活检组相比,手术切除组的总体生存率(OS)(中位数:676 天,p < 0.001)和无进展生存率(PFS)(中位数:328 天,p < 0.001)均表现出良好的反应。与活检组相比,O6-甲基鸟嘌呤-DNA 甲基转移酶非甲基化(对数秩检验 p = 0.0035)或甲基化组(对数秩检验 p = 0.021)的手术切除组的预后更好。手术切除与更好的预后显著相关(风险比:0.214,p = 0.006)。对于没有脑室壁增强病变或多个病变的丘脑 GBM,超过 80%的最大程度手术切除显示出良好的临床结果,与活检相比,总体生存率延长。术中检查术中变化的辅助手术技术有助于选择合适的手术方法,以降低手术发病率。