Suppr超能文献

促进人体感染挑战研究中的伦理付费。

Promoting Ethical Payment in Human Infection Challenge Studies.

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine.

University of Sheffield.

出版信息

Am J Bioeth. 2021 Mar;21(3):11-31. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1854368. Epub 2021 Feb 4.

Abstract

To prepare for potential human infection challenge studies (HICS) involving SARS-CoV-2, we convened a multidisciplinary working group to address ethical questions regarding whether and how much SARS-CoV-2 HICS participants should be paid. Because the goals of paying HICS participants, as well as the relevant ethical concerns, are the same as those arising for other types of clinical research, the same basic framework for ethical payment can apply. This framework divides payment into reimbursement, compensation, and incentives, focusing on fairness and promoting adequate recruitment and retention as counterweights to concerns about undue inducement. Within the basic framework, several factors are especially salient for HICS, and for SARS-CoV-2 HICS in particular, including the nature of participant confinement, anticipated discomfort, risks and uncertainty, participant motivations, and trust. These factors are reflected in a payment worksheet created to help sponsors, researchers, and ethics reviewers systematically develop and assess ethically justifiable payment amounts.

摘要

为了筹备可能涉及 SARS-CoV-2 的人体感染挑战研究(human infection challenge studies,HICS),我们召集了一个多学科工作组,以解决与 SARS-CoV-2 HICS 参与者是否应该以及应该支付多少报酬有关的伦理问题。由于支付 HICS 参与者报酬的目的以及相关的伦理问题与其他类型的临床研究相同,因此可以应用相同的基本伦理报酬框架。该框架将支付分为报销、补偿和激励,重点关注公平性,并促进充足的招募和保留,以平衡对不当诱导的担忧。在基本框架内,有几个因素对于 HICS 特别重要,对于 SARS-CoV-2 HICS 尤其如此,包括参与者的禁闭性质、预期的不适、风险和不确定性、参与者的动机以及信任。这些因素反映在一份支付工作表中,旨在帮助赞助商、研究人员和伦理审查员系统地制定和评估在伦理上合理的支付金额。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验