Shogren Karrie A, Dean Evan E, Burke Kathryn M, Raley Sheida K, Taylor Julie Lounds
Karrie A. Shogren and Evan E. Dean, University of Kansas.
Kathryn M. Burke, Temple University.
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2021 Feb 1;59(1):7-21. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-59.1.7.
Goal setting and attainment is often a targeted outcome in the intellectual and developmental disabilities field; however, standardizing the measurement of attainment of individualized goals is challenging. The purpose of this article is to introduce a four-domain framework that provides a series of questions to research and evaluation teams in planning for the use of goal attainment scaling (GAS) as an outcome measure at the individual or aggregate level. We intend to stimulate discussion and ongoing work to further systematize how GAS is used in (a) intervention research to establish evidence-based practices and (b) practice to assess the extent to which interventions and supports lead to intended outcomes. The goal is to promote a clear planning process to inform data collection on individualized goal attainment outcomes that are rooted in goals and outcomes valued by people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
目标设定与达成通常是智力和发育障碍领域的一个既定成果;然而,对个性化目标达成情况的测量进行标准化颇具挑战性。本文旨在介绍一个四领域框架,该框架为研究和评估团队在规划将目标达成量表(GAS)用作个体或总体层面的结果测量时提供了一系列问题。我们旨在激发讨论和持续的工作,以进一步系统化GAS在以下方面的使用:(a)干预研究中用以确立循证实践,以及(b)实践中用以评估干预和支持在多大程度上带来预期结果。目标是推动一个清晰的规划过程,为基于智力和发育障碍者所重视的目标及结果的个性化目标达成结果的数据收集提供信息。