Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Penn Presbyterian Hospital, 51 North 39th Street, Wright Saunders Building, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Oct;45(5):2208-2219. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02149-y. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
The Fleur-de-Lis panniculectomy (FdL) adds a vertical component to correct complex contour deformities after massive weight loss by addressing supra-umbilical horizontal skin excess which is not addressed with infra-umbilical transverse panniculectomy (TP). We aim to perform a head-to-head comparison of clinical outcomes and patient reported outcomes (PROs) between FdL and TP.
A retrospective review of patients ≥18 with a history of bariatric surgery undergoing FdL or TP by a single plastic surgeon between 07/01/2015 and 05/31/2020 was conducted. Surgical site occurrences (SSOs) including surgical site infection (SSI), delayed healing, cellulitis, seroma, hematoma, surgical site occurrences requiring procedural intervention (SSOpi), and a composite of other postoperative outcomes were assessed. In addition, patient satisfaction was analyzed using the Body-Q questionnaire across 12 domains.
The analysis included 56 patients; 26 and 30 patients who were treated with FdL and TP, respectively. Cohorts were statistically similar in terms of age, gender, BMI, and co-morbid conditions. The overall complication rate was 50% (FdL n = 14 (53.9%), TP n = 14 (46.7%); p = 0.592). On multivariate analysis, pannus weight was associated with the development of SSO (p = 0.04). FdL incision, however, was not an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes. Absolute improvement in PROs was similar in both cohorts across multiple domains.
FdL showed a comparable safety and efficacy profile to TP when performed in post-bariatric surgery patients, with equivalent improvement in PROs across multiple domains. Preoperative weight loss should be encouraged in this population as pannus weight is an independent risk factor for complications.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Fleur-de-Lis 腹带切除术(FdL)通过解决上腹部横向皮肤过多的问题,为减重手术后的复杂轮廓畸形增加了垂直成分,而这是下腹部横向腹带切除术(TP)无法解决的。我们旨在对头颈对头比较 FdL 和 TP 的临床结果和患者报告的结果(PROs)。
对 2015 年 7 月 1 日至 2020 年 5 月 31 日期间,由同一位整形外科医生对≥18 岁的接受过减重手术的患者进行 FdL 或 TP 治疗的历史进行回顾性审查。评估手术部位并发症(SSO),包括手术部位感染(SSI)、延迟愈合、蜂窝织炎、血清肿、血肿、需要手术干预的手术部位并发症(SSOpi),以及其他术后结果的综合评估。此外,使用 Body-Q 问卷在 12 个领域分析患者满意度。
该分析包括 56 名患者;26 名和 30 名患者分别接受了 FdL 和 TP 治疗。两组在年龄、性别、BMI 和合并症方面均具有统计学相似性。总的并发症发生率为 50%(FdL 组 n = 14(53.9%),TP 组 n = 14(46.7%);p = 0.592)。多变量分析显示,腹部赘肉的重量与 SSO 的发生有关(p = 0.04)。然而,FdL 切口并不是不良结果的独立危险因素。在多个领域,FdL 和 TP 组的 PRO 均有类似的绝对改善。
FdL 在减重手术后患者中表现出与 TP 相当的安全性和疗效,在多个领域的 PRO 改善程度相当。应鼓励该人群进行术前减重,因为腹部赘肉的重量是并发症的独立危险因素。
证据水平 III:本杂志要求作者为每篇文章分配一个证据水平。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者指南 www.springer.com/00266。