Sosa-Rubí Sandra G, Bautista-Arredondo Sergio, Chivardi-Moreno Carlos, Contreras-Loya David, La Hera-Fuentes Gina, Opuni Marjorie
Division of Health Economics, National Institute of Public Health (INSP), Cuernavaca, Mexico.
School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Health Care Manag Sci. 2021 Mar;24(1):41-54. doi: 10.1007/s10729-020-09541-1. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
Few studies have assessed the efficiency and quality of HIV services in low-resource settings or considered the factors that determine both performance dimensions. To provide insights on the performance of outpatient HIV prevention units, we used benchmarking methods to identify best-practices in terms of technical efficiency and process quality and uncover management practices with the potential to improve efficiency and quality. We used data collected in 338 facilities in Kenya, Nigeria, Rwanda, South Africa, and Zambia. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) was used to estimate technical efficiency. Process quality was estimated using data from medical vignettes. We mapped the relationship between efficiency and quality scores and studied the managerial determinants of best performance in terms of both efficiency and quality. We also explored the relationship between management factors and efficiency and quality independently. We found levels of both technical efficiency and process quality to be low, though there was substantial variation across countries. One third of facilities were mapped in the best-performing group with above-median efficiency and above-median quality. Several management practices were associated with best performance in terms of both efficiency and quality. When considering efficiency and quality independently, the patterns of associations between management practices and the two performance dimensions were not necessarily the same. One management characteristic was associated with best performance in terms of efficiency and quality and also positively associated with efficiency and quality independently: number of supervision visits to HIV units.
很少有研究评估资源匮乏地区艾滋病毒服务的效率和质量,或者考虑决定这两个绩效维度的因素。为了深入了解门诊艾滋病毒预防单位的绩效,我们使用标杆管理方法来确定技术效率和流程质量方面的最佳实践,并发现有可能提高效率和质量的管理实践。我们使用了在肯尼亚、尼日利亚、卢旺达、南非和赞比亚338个机构收集的数据。数据包络分析(DEA)用于估计技术效率。使用医疗案例数据估计流程质量。我们绘制了效率得分与质量得分之间的关系,并研究了在效率和质量方面最佳绩效的管理决定因素。我们还分别探讨了管理因素与效率和质量之间的关系。我们发现技术效率和流程质量水平都很低,不过各国之间存在很大差异。三分之一的机构被归入绩效最佳组,其效率和质量均高于中位数。有几种管理实践与效率和质量方面的最佳绩效相关。当分别考虑效率和质量时,管理实践与这两个绩效维度之间的关联模式不一定相同。有一个管理特征与效率和质量方面的最佳绩效相关,并且分别与效率和质量呈正相关:对艾滋病毒单位的监督访问次数。