Department of Biochemistry, Centre Ressources Biologiques de Montpellier, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
PhyMedExp, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR 9214, Montpellier, France.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021 Feb 4;59(7):1299-1306. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0903. Print 2021 Jun 25.
Inflammation is a hallmark of heart failure (HF) and among inflammatory biomarkers, the most studied remains the C-reactive protein (CRP). In recent years several biomarkers have emerged, such as sST2 and soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR). This study set out to examine the relative importance of long-time prognostic strength of suPAR and the potential additive information on patient risk with chronic HF in comparison with pronostic value of CRP and sST2.
Demographics, clinical and biological variables were assessed in a total of 182 patients with chronic HF over median follow-up period of 80 months. Inflammatory biomarkers (i.e., CRP, sST2, and suPAR) were performed.
In univariate Cox regression analysis age, NYHA class, MAGGIC score and the five biomarkers (N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP], high-sensitive cardiac troponin T [hs-cTnT], CRP, sST2, and suPAR) were associated with both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. In the multivariate model, only NT-proBNP, suPAR, and MAGGIC score remained independent predictors of all-cause mortality as well as of cardiovascular mortality. Risk classification analysis was significantly improved with the addition of suPAR particularly for all-cause short- and long-term mortality. Using a classification tree approach, the same three variables could be considered as significant classifier variables to predict all-cause or cardiovascular mortality and an algorithm were reported. We demonstrated the favorable outcome associated with patients with a low MAGGIC score and a low suPAR level by comparison to patients with low MAGGIC score but high suPAR values.
The main findings of our study are (1) that among the three inflammatory biomarkers, only suPAR levels were independently associated with 96-month mortality for patients with chronic HF and (2) that an algorithm based on clinical score, a cardiomyocyte stress biomarker and an inflammatory biomarker could help to a more reliable long term risk stratification in heart failure.
炎症是心力衰竭(HF)的标志之一,在炎症生物标志物中,研究最多的仍然是 C 反应蛋白(CRP)。近年来,出现了几种生物标志物,如 sST2 和可溶性尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物受体(suPAR)。本研究旨在检查 suPAR 的长期预后强度与 CRP 和 sST2 的预测价值相比,对慢性 HF 患者风险的潜在附加信息的相对重要性。
在中位随访 80 个月的时间里,对 182 例慢性 HF 患者评估了人口统计学、临床和生物学变量。进行了炎症生物标志物(即 CRP、sST2 和 suPAR)检测。
在单变量 Cox 回归分析中,年龄、NYHA 分级、MAGGIC 评分和 5 种生物标志物(N 端脑利钠肽前体[NT-proBNP]、高敏心肌肌钙蛋白 T[hs-cTnT]、CRP、sST2 和 suPAR)与全因和心血管死亡率均相关。在多变量模型中,只有 NT-proBNP、suPAR 和 MAGGIC 评分仍然是全因死亡率以及心血管死亡率的独立预测因子。风险分类分析显示,suPAR 的加入可显著改善全因短期和长期死亡率的预测。使用分类树方法,可以考虑这三个变量作为预测全因或心血管死亡率的重要分类变量,并报告了一个算法。我们通过比较低 MAGGIC 评分和低 suPAR 值的患者与低 MAGGIC 评分但高 suPAR 值的患者,证明了患者具有较低 MAGGIC 评分和较低 suPAR 水平的良好预后。
本研究的主要发现是:(1)在这 3 种炎症生物标志物中,只有 suPAR 水平与慢性 HF 患者 96 个月的死亡率独立相关;(2)基于临床评分、心肌细胞应激标志物和炎症生物标志物的算法可帮助对心力衰竭进行更可靠的长期风险分层。