Głuchowski Andrzej, Šadzevičius Raimondas, Skominas Rytis, Sas Wojciech
SGGW Water Centre, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, 02787 Warsaw, Poland.
Institute of Hydraulic Engineering, Vytautas Magnus University Agriculture Academy, 53361 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Materials (Basel). 2021 Feb 3;14(4):717. doi: 10.3390/ma14040717.
Buried pipe design requires knowledge about the fill to design the backfill structure. The interaction between the backfill envelope and the pipe impacts the structural performance of the buried pipe. The backfill material and compaction level respond to the backfill's overall strength and, therefore, for pipe-soil interaction. The strength of backfill material is described in terms of modulus of soil reaction and constrained modulus . As the is an empirical parameter, the can be measured in the laboratory by performing the oedometer tests. In this study, we have performed extensive oedometric tests on five types of anthropogenic materials (AM). Three of them are construction and demolition materials (C-D materials) namely, recycled concrete aggregate (RCA), crushed brick (CB), and recycled asphalt pavement (RAP). Two of them are industrial solid wastes (ISW) namely, fly ash and bottom slag mix (FA + BS) and blast furnace slag (BFS). The results of the tests revealed that AM behaves differently from natural aggregates (NA). In general, the value for AM is lower than for NA with the same gradation. Despite that, some of AM may be used as NA substitute directly (RCA or BFS), some with special treatment like CB and some with extra compaction efforts like RAP or FA + BS.
埋地管道设计需要了解回填土情况以设计回填结构。回填土包络与管道之间的相互作用会影响埋地管道的结构性能。回填材料和压实程度决定了回填土的整体强度,进而影响管道与土壤的相互作用。回填材料的强度用土抗力模量和约束模量来描述。由于土抗力模量是一个经验参数,可以通过在实验室进行固结试验来测量。在本研究中,我们对五种类型的人工材料(AM)进行了大量的固结试验。其中三种是建筑拆除材料(C-D材料),即再生混凝土骨料(RCA)、碎砖(CB)和再生沥青路面(RAP)。另外两种是工业固体废物(ISW),即粉煤灰和底渣混合物(FA + BS)以及高炉矿渣(BFS)。试验结果表明,人工材料的表现与天然骨料(NA)不同。一般来说,相同级配下人工材料的土抗力模量值低于天然骨料。尽管如此,一些人工材料(如RCA或BFS)可直接用作天然骨料的替代品,一些(如CB)需要特殊处理,还有一些(如RAP或FA + BS)需要额外的压实措施。