Jennings Rosalind, Seehra Jadbinder, Cobourne Martyn T
Department of Orthodontics, Centre for Craniofacial Development & Regeneration, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
J Orthod. 2021 Jun;48(2):101-109. doi: 10.1177/1465312520988549. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
To survey the opinion of British Orthodontic Society members on the .
Data collection involved an anonymous cross-sectional online SurveyMonkey™ questionnaire.
An email invitation to complete the survey was sent to the 1842 members of the British Orthodontic Society on 9 June 2020 with a follow-up reminder on 15 July 2020. The invitation contained a brief description and online link to the questionnaire, which was active between 9 June and 9 August 2020. The 15-item questionnaire covered frequency of reading, preferred format, likes and dislikes, and what changes might improve the . Data were analysed for the membership as a whole using simple descriptive statistics.
In total, 310 individuals completed the questionnaire, representing a response rate of 17% with 74.2% (n = 230) reporting reading at least one article per issue. The most popular way of reading the (77.4%, n = 240) was through the distributed print copy. Overall, 63.6% (n=197) rated the as excellent and 35.2% (n = 109) as satisfactory, with only 1.3% (n = 4) responding that it was poor. The scientific and clinical articles were the most popular aspect of the and 90.3% (n = 280) of respondents felt the content was relevant to their current clinical practice. Respondents were also given the opportunity to make additional free-text comments; and themes that emerged included a wish for more clinical content, more online interaction with authors through webinars and continued professional development.
The is perceived as being relevant to current clinical practice by members of the British Orthodontic Society and has high-level satisfaction. There is a desire for more online interaction with the membership as part of its role within the society. However, the overall response rate was low and therefore a high risk of potential bias associated with this survey.
调查英国正畸学会成员对[具体内容缺失]的看法。
数据收集采用匿名横断面在线SurveyMonkey™问卷。
2020年6月9日向英国正畸学会的1842名成员发送了完成调查的电子邮件邀请，并于2020年7月15日发送了跟进提醒。邀请中包含问卷的简要描述和在线链接，问卷于2020年6月9日至8月9日期间有效。这份15项的问卷涵盖了阅读频率、偏好格式、喜欢和不喜欢的内容，以及哪些改变可能会改善[具体内容缺失]。使用简单描述性统计对全体会员的数据进行了分析。
共有310人完成了问卷，回复率为17%，74.2%（n = 230）的人报告每期至少阅读一篇文章。阅读[具体内容缺失]最受欢迎的方式（77.4%，n = 240）是通过分发的印刷版。总体而言，63.6%（n = 197）的人将[具体内容缺失]评为优秀，35.2%（n = 109）评为满意，只有1.3%（n = 4）的人认为较差。科学和临床文章是[具体内容缺失]最受欢迎的方面，90.3%（n = 280）的受访者认为[具体内容缺失]的内容与他们当前的临床实践相关。受访者还被给予机会进行额外的自由文本评论；出现的主题包括希望有更多临床内容、通过网络研讨会与作者进行更多在线互动以及持续专业发展。
英国正畸学会成员认为[具体内容缺失]与当前临床实践相关且满意度较高。作为其在学会中的作用的一部分，希望与会员有更多在线互动。然而，总体回复率较低，因此本次调查存在潜在偏差的高风险。
