Department of Nuclear Medicine, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
J Nucl Med. 2021 Oct;62(10):1422-1429. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.258574. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
Over 20 different prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting radiopharmaceuticals for both imaging and therapy have been synthesized. Although variability in biodistribution and affinity for binding to the PSMA receptor is known to exist between different PSMA-targeting radiopharmaceuticals, little is known about the clinical implications of this variability. Therefore, this study analyzed differences in interreader agreement and detection rate between 2 regularly used F-labeled PSMA receptor-targeting radiopharmaceuticals: F-DCFPyL and F-PSMA-1007. One hundred twenty consecutive patients scanned with F-PSMA-1007 were match-paired with 120 patients scanned with F-DCFPyL. All 240 PET/CT scans were reviewed by 2 readers and scored according to the criteria of the PSMA Reporting and Data System. Interreader agreement and the detection rate for suspected lesions were scored for different anatomic locations such as the prostate, prostatic fossa, lymph nodes, and bone. Great equality was found between F-DCFPyL and F-PSMA-1007; however, some clinically relevant and statistically significant differences were observed. F-PSMA-1007 detected suspected prostatic or prostatic fossa lesions in a higher proportion of patients and especially in the subcohort scanned for biochemical recurrence. F-DCFPyL and F-PSMA-1007 showed an equal ability to detect suspected lymph nodes, although interreader agreement for F-DCFPyL was higher. F-DCFPyL showed fewer equivocal skeletal lesions and higher interreader agreement on skeletal lesions. Most of the equivocal lesions found with F-PSMA-1007 at least were determined to be of nonmetastatic origin. Clinically relevant differences, which may account for diagnostic dilemmas, were observed between F-DCFPyL and F-PSMA-1007. Those findings encourage further studies, as they may have consequences for selection of the proper PSMA-targeting radiopharmaceutical.
已经合成了 20 多种用于成像和治疗的前列腺特异性膜抗原 (PSMA)-靶向放射性药物。尽管不同的 PSMA 靶向放射性药物在生物分布和与 PSMA 受体结合的亲和力方面存在差异,但对这种差异的临床意义知之甚少。因此,本研究分析了两种常用的 F 标记 PSMA 受体靶向放射性药物 F-DCFPyL 和 F-PSMA-1007 之间的读者间一致性和检测率差异。将 120 例连续接受 F-PSMA-1007 扫描的患者与 120 例接受 F-DCFPyL 扫描的患者进行配对。所有 240 次 PET/CT 扫描均由 2 位读者进行回顾,并根据 PSMA 报告和数据系统的标准进行评分。对不同解剖部位(如前列腺、前列腺窝、淋巴结和骨骼)的可疑病变进行了读者间一致性和检测率评分。F-DCFPyL 和 F-PSMA-1007 之间发现了很大的平等性;然而,观察到了一些具有临床意义和统计学意义的差异。F-PSMA-1007 在更高比例的患者中检测到疑似前列腺或前列腺窝病变,特别是在接受生化复发扫描的亚组中。F-DCFPyL 和 F-PSMA-1007 对疑似淋巴结的检测能力相等,尽管 F-DCFPyL 的读者间一致性更高。F-DCFPyL 显示出较少的不确定骨骼病变和更高的骨骼病变读者间一致性。用 F-PSMA-1007 发现的大多数不确定病变至少被确定为非转移性起源。F-DCFPyL 和 F-PSMA-1007 之间观察到了具有临床意义的差异,这些差异可能导致诊断上的困境。这些发现鼓励进一步研究,因为它们可能对选择适当的 PSMA 靶向放射性药物产生影响。