Hodgson K J, Shah D M, Leather R P, Corson J D, Karmody A M
Division of Vascular Surgery, Albany Medical Center, New York 12208.
Am J Surg. 1988 Apr;155(4):606-10. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80419-7.
The Warren shunt, despite its recognized attributes, has several major obstacles to gaining widespread acceptance in the surgical community. These include its technical difficulty and the increased incidence of postoperative ascites. We have begun using a retroperitoneal approach for the performance of this procedure, which we believe is technically easier and may lessen postoperative ascites. In addition, blood loss, the need for ventilatory support and intensive care, and the occurrence of postoperative ileus have all been reduced in our experience. Herein, we have reported the details of this approach and discussed its major advantages over the classic transperitoneal approach to the distal splenorenal shunt.
尽管沃伦分流术具有公认的优点,但在外科界获得广泛认可仍存在几个主要障碍。这些障碍包括技术难度大以及术后腹水发生率增加。我们已开始采用腹膜后入路来实施该手术,我们认为这种方法在技术上更简便,且可能会减少术后腹水。此外,根据我们的经验,术中失血量、对通气支持和重症监护的需求以及术后肠梗阻的发生率均有所降低。在此,我们报告了这种手术入路的详细情况,并讨论了其相对于经典经腹远端脾肾分流术的主要优势。