• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区居住老年人饮食和抗阻运动干预的成本效益:ProMuscle 在实践中。

Cost-effectiveness of a Diet and Resistance Exercise Intervention in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: ProMuscle in Practice.

机构信息

Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, the Netherlands.

Chair group Consumption and Healthy Lifestyles, Wageningen University and Research, the Netherlands; GGD Noord- en Oost-Gelderland, Academic Collaborative Center AGORA, Zutphen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Apr;22(4):792-802.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.12.036. Epub 2021 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2020.12.036
PMID:33548182
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Ageing is associated with a decline in functioning and a loss of independence, which will lead to increased health care costs in the future. The ProMuscle in Practice intervention was found to be effective in improving muscle strength, muscle mass, and functioning of older adults. The current study assesses the cost-effectiveness and perceived benefits of the intervention.

DESIGN

Trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis complemented by interviews.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 168 community-dwelling older adults were included. Intervention participants started with a 12-week intensive support program, comprising resistance exercise guided by physiotherapists and consultations with a dietitian to increase protein intake. To maintain the adapted lifestyle pattern, they continued with a 12-week moderate support intervention. The control group received usual care.

METHODS

Costs and outcomes were measured at baseline, after 12 and 24 weeks. Costs were assessed from a societal perspective. Health care use, out-of-pocket costs, and productivity losses were measured using questionnaires. Intervention costs were quantified according to bottom-up micro-costing. Outcomes included quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) and physical functioning (Short Physical Performance Battery [SPPB]). Bootstrap analyses were used to generate cost-effectiveness planes and acceptability curves. Interviews with participants and professionals were conducted after 24 weeks to measure perceived benefits.

RESULTS

An Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio of €2988 ($3385)/point increase in SPPB was found. The intervention has an 82.4% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness to pay (WTP) of €12.000 ($13.559)/point increase in SPPB. No change in quality of life was found according to EQ-5D-5L. Interviews, however, revealed a wide range of function-related perceived benefits.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

At a WTP of €12.000 ($13.559)/point increase in SPPB, the intervention was found to have an 82.4% probability of being cost-effective. Because generic quality of life questionnaires seem unable to detect subtle changes in public health interventions, future studies are advised to include targeted and specific questionnaires.

摘要

目的

衰老与功能下降和独立性丧失有关,这将导致未来医疗保健成本增加。ProMuscle 在实践中的干预措施被发现能有效提高老年人的肌肉力量、肌肉质量和功能。本研究评估了干预措施的成本效益和感知收益。

设计

基于试验的成本效益分析,辅以访谈。

地点和参与者

共纳入 168 名社区居住的老年人。干预组参与者首先参加了为期 12 周的强化支持计划,包括由物理治疗师指导的阻力运动和与营养师咨询以增加蛋白质摄入。为了保持适应的生活方式模式,他们继续参加为期 12 周的适度支持干预。对照组接受常规护理。

方法

在基线、12 周和 24 周时测量成本和结果。从社会角度评估成本。使用问卷测量医疗保健使用、自付费用和生产力损失。根据自下而上的微观成本核算量化干预成本。结果包括生活质量(EQ-5D-5L)和身体功能(简短身体表现电池 [SPPB])。使用 Bootstrap 分析生成成本效益图和可接受性曲线。在 24 周后对参与者和专业人员进行访谈,以衡量感知收益。

结果

发现 SPPB 每增加 1 分的增量成本效益比为 2988 欧元(3385 美元)。在愿意支付 12000 欧元(13559 美元)/SPPB 每增加 1 分时,干预措施有 82.4%的可能性具有成本效益。根据 EQ-5D-5L,生活质量没有变化。然而,访谈显示出广泛的与功能相关的感知收益。

结论和影响

在愿意支付 12000 欧元(13559 美元)/SPPB 每增加 1 分时,干预措施有 82.4%的可能性具有成本效益。由于通用生活质量问卷似乎无法检测到公共卫生干预措施的细微变化,因此建议未来的研究包括有针对性和特定的问卷。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of a Diet and Resistance Exercise Intervention in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: ProMuscle in Practice.社区居住老年人饮食和抗阻运动干预的成本效益:ProMuscle 在实践中。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Apr;22(4):792-802.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.12.036. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
2
Effect, process, and economic evaluation of a combined resistance exercise and diet intervention (ProMuscle in Practice) for community-dwelling older adults: design and methods of a randomised controlled trial.社区居住的老年人联合抗阻运动和饮食干预(ProMuscle 在实践中)的效果、过程和经济评价:一项随机对照试验的设计和方法。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jul 13;18(1):877. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5788-8.
3
Effectiveness of a Diet and Resistance Exercise Intervention on Muscle Health in Older Adults: ProMuscle in Practice.饮食和抗阻运动干预对老年人肌肉健康的有效性:ProMuscle 的实践。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Aug;21(8):1065-1072.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.11.026. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
4
Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility of a Home-Based Exercise Program in Geriatric Patients with Cognitive Impairment.基于家庭的运动方案对老年认知障碍患者的成本效益和成本效用研究
Gerontology. 2021;67(2):220-232. doi: 10.1159/000512748. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
5
Economic Evaluation of a Reablement Training Program for Homecare Staff Targeting Sedentary Behavior in Community-Dwelling Older Adults Compared to Usual Care: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.经济评价一种再培训计划对居家护理人员针对社区居住的老年人久坐行为与常规护理相比:一项整群随机对照试验。
Clin Interv Aging. 2021 Dec 22;16:2095-2109. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S341221. eCollection 2021.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of a Group vs Individually Delivered Exercise Program in Community-Dwelling Persons Aged ≥70 Years.针对70岁及以上社区居民的团体运动计划与个人运动计划的成本效益分析
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 May;23(5):736-742.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.08.041. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
7
Cost-effectiveness of the SLIMMER diabetes prevention intervention in Dutch primary health care: economic evaluation from a randomised controlled trial.SLIMMER 糖尿病预防干预在荷兰初级卫生保健中的成本效益:一项随机对照试验的经济学评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 11;19(1):824. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4529-8.
8
Cost-effectiveness of exercise referral schemes enhanced by self-management strategies to battle sedentary behaviour in older adults: protocol for an economic evaluation alongside the SITLESS three-armed pragmatic randomised controlled trial.通过自我管理策略加强运动转诊计划以对抗老年人久坐行为的成本效益:与SITLESS三臂实用随机对照试验同时进行的经济评估方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 15;8(10):e022266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022266.
9
Action Seniors! Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Secondary Falls Prevention Strategy Among Community-Dwelling Older Fallers.行动起来,老年人!社区居住的老年跌倒者二级跌倒预防策略的成本效益分析。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Sep;68(9):1988-1997. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16476. Epub 2020 May 29.
10
Targeting the underlying causes of undernutrition. Cost-effectiveness of a multifactorial personalized intervention in community-dwelling older adults: A randomized controlled trial.针对营养不良的根本原因。社区居住的老年人多因素个体化干预的成本效益:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Nutr. 2017 Dec;36(6):1498-1508. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.09.030. Epub 2016 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Combined Protein, Probiotics, and Exercise Therapy for Sarcopenia: A Comprehensive Review.蛋白质、益生菌和运动联合疗法治疗肌肉减少症:综述
Cells. 2025 Sep 3;14(17):1375. doi: 10.3390/cells14171375.
2
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a home-based functional exercise programme for community-dwelling frail older adults, ACTIVE-AGE@home, provided by professionals and volunteers: protocol of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.由专业人员和志愿者提供的针对社区居家体弱老年人的居家功能锻炼计划ACTIVE-AGE@home的有效性和成本效益:一项实用随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 7;15(4):e090746. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090746.
3
Community-based complex interventions to sustain independence in older people, stratified by frailty: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
基于社区的复杂干预措施,针对体弱老年人维持其独立性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(48):1-194. doi: 10.3310/HNRP2514.
4
Health Economic Evaluation of a Controlled Lifestyle Intervention: The Healthy Lifestyle Community Program (Cohort 2; HLCP-2).控制生活方式干预的健康经济评价:健康生活方式社区计划(队列 2;HLCP-2)。
Nutrients. 2023 Dec 8;15(24):5045. doi: 10.3390/nu15245045.
5
Study protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial to improve dietary diversity and physical fitness among older people who live at home (the "ALAPAGE study").一项实用的整群随机对照试验研究方案,旨在提高居家老年人的饮食多样性和身体健康(“ALAPAGE 研究”)。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Aug 4;22(1):643. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03260-8.
6
The Effects of Lifestyle and Diet on Gut Microbiota Composition, Inflammation and Muscle Performance in Our Aging Society.生活方式和饮食对老龄化社会中肠道微生物组成、炎症和肌肉性能的影响。
Nutrients. 2021 Jun 15;13(6):2045. doi: 10.3390/nu13062045.
7
Weight Loss through Lifestyle Intervention Improves Mobility in Older Adults.生活方式干预减轻体重可改善老年人活动能力。
Gerontologist. 2022 Jul 15;62(6):931-941. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab048.