Spinal Epidural Fistulas-A Separate Entity to Dural Fistulas with Different Angioarchitecture and Treatment Approach.

OBJECTIVE

Spinal epidural arteriovenous fistulas (SEAVFs) are the rarest variety of spinal vascular malformation and are often misdiagnosed as type 1 spinal dural fistula. This retrospective study highlights the salient anatomic differentiating points of these entities and also highlights the importance of a planned endovascular treatment approach using different routes of access. Efficacy of the endovascular treatment at 3 months follow-up was also studied.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 11 treated patients with SEAVF. Existence of epidural arteriovenous fistula in all these patients was confirmed by spinal angiography. The Aminoff-Logue Scale score was assigned both before and after the procedure. The statistical results were expressed as percentages, and the preprocedure scale was compared with the postprocedure scale at 3 months by using a nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

The patients ranged in age from 7 to 53 years, with male predominance. Paraparesis was the commonest symptom, and 1 patient had congestive cardiac failure caused by a large fistula. Location was mostly dorsolumbar with intradural venous reflux into the perimedullary venous system (Castilla type A) noted in 3/11(27%) patients, and the remaining 73% patients had Castilla type B1 with an enlarged epidural venous sac. Therapeutic embolization was performed from arterial, venous, or combined routes. The 3-month postprocedure clinical assessment showed statistically significant (P < 0.004) improvement in the Aminoff-Logue Scale score.

CONCLUSIONS

The differentiating points between SEAVF compared with type 1 spinal dural fistula are emphasized. The study also highlights the importance of a good angiographic assessment to best access the fistula by arterial, venous, percutaneous, or combined routes. Endovascular treatment resulted in statistically significant clinical improvement at 3 months follow-up.