Sierra Spine Institute, Roseville, California, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at the University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
World Neurosurg. 2021 May;149:e705-e713. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.113. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
Lateral interbody fusion (LIF) is traditionally performed in lateral decubitus on a breaking surgical table to improve L4-L5 access. Prone transpsoas (PTP) LIF may improve sagittal alignment and facilitate single-position circumferential procedures; but may require manipulation of the iliac crest for L4-L5 accessibility.
Healthy adult volunteers (n = 41) were positioned as if for surgery in right-lateral decubitus on a radiolucent breaking table, and also prone on a Jackson-style surgical frame atop a custom PTP bolster. Iliac crest distance from the L5 superior endplate, and coronal and sagittal plane alignments were measured from fluororadiographs obtained in each of 5 positions: standard lateral decubitus (LD), prone-hips and spine neutral (PR-NN), prone-hips neutral and spine coronally bent (PR-NCB), prone-hips extended and spine neutral (PR-EN), and prone-hips extended and spine coronally bent (PR-ECB).
L4-L5 accessibility was lowest in prone-neutral and improved in all augmented positional configurations: PR-NN<>PR-EN<LD<PR-ECB<PR-NCB. Coronal bending with the PTP positioner created greater accessibility than that achieved by lateral decubitus breaking (PR-NCB>LD, P = 0.0480). Coronal angulations were greatest in LD, and statistically different from both prone neutral (LD>PR-NN, P < 0.0001) and prone coronally bent (LD>PR-NCB, P < 0.0001). Lordosis was greatest in extended prone positions and lowest in lateral decubitus: PR-EN>PR-ECB>PR-NCB<>PR-NN>LD. All prone positions showed significantly greater lordosis than lateral decubitus (P < 0.001).
Compared with lateral decubitus, prone positioning provides equivalent or better L4-L5 LIF access around the iliac crest when a positioner is used that enables coronal bending, and improved positional lordosis, which may facilitate segmental correction and achievement of surgical alignment goals.
传统的侧方椎体间融合术(LIF)是在侧卧位于手术台上进行的,以改善 L4-L5 的入路。俯卧位经椎间孔椎体间融合术(PTP LIF)可能改善矢状面排列,并有利于单体位的环形手术;但可能需要对髂嵴进行操作以获得 L4-L5 的可及性。
健康成年志愿者(n=41)在透视式手术台上以右侧侧卧位定位,就像准备手术一样,并在定制的 PTP 垫上的 Jackson 式手术架上以俯卧位定位。从获得的 5 个位置的透视片测量髂嵴距离 L5 上终板的距离,以及冠状面和矢状面排列:标准侧卧位(LD)、俯卧位-髋关节和脊柱中立位(PR-NN)、俯卧位-髋关节中立位和脊柱冠状弯曲位(PR-NCB)、俯卧位-髋关节伸展位和脊柱中立位(PR-EN)以及俯卧位-髋关节伸展位和脊柱冠状弯曲位(PR-ECB)。
俯卧位中立位时 L4-L5 的可及性最低,所有增强的定位配置均有所改善:PR-NN<>PR-EN<LD<PR-ECB<PR-NCB。PTP 定位器的冠状弯曲比侧卧位破坏产生更大的可及性(PR-NCB>LD,P=0.0480)。LD 时的冠状角最大,与俯卧位中立位(LD>PR-NN,P<0.0001)和俯卧位冠状弯曲位(LD>PR-NCB,P<0.0001)有统计学差异。伸展位俯卧位的脊柱前凸最大,侧卧位最低:PR-EN>PR-ECB>PR-NCB<>PR-NN>LD。所有俯卧位的脊柱前凸均显著大于侧卧位(P<0.001)。
与侧卧位相比,当使用可实现冠状弯曲和改善定位前凸的定位器时,俯卧位可提供同等或更好的 L4-L5 LIF 入路,以绕过髂嵴,改善体位前凸,从而有利于节段矫正和实现手术对齐目标。