Suppr超能文献

手术体位对侧方经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术 L4-L5 节段可及性和腰椎前凸的影响:无症状成年人俯卧位与侧卧位的比较。

Effects of Surgical Positioning on L4-L5 Accessibility and Lumbar Lordosis in Lateral Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison of Prone and Lateral Decubitus in Asymptomatic Adults.

机构信息

Sierra Spine Institute, Roseville, California, USA.

Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at the University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2021 May;149:e705-e713. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.113. Epub 2021 Feb 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lateral interbody fusion (LIF) is traditionally performed in lateral decubitus on a breaking surgical table to improve L4-L5 access. Prone transpsoas (PTP) LIF may improve sagittal alignment and facilitate single-position circumferential procedures; but may require manipulation of the iliac crest for L4-L5 accessibility.

METHODS

Healthy adult volunteers (n = 41) were positioned as if for surgery in right-lateral decubitus on a radiolucent breaking table, and also prone on a Jackson-style surgical frame atop a custom PTP bolster. Iliac crest distance from the L5 superior endplate, and coronal and sagittal plane alignments were measured from fluororadiographs obtained in each of 5 positions: standard lateral decubitus (LD), prone-hips and spine neutral (PR-NN), prone-hips neutral and spine coronally bent (PR-NCB), prone-hips extended and spine neutral (PR-EN), and prone-hips extended and spine coronally bent (PR-ECB).

RESULTS

L4-L5 accessibility was lowest in prone-neutral and improved in all augmented positional configurations: PR-NN<>PR-EN<LD<PR-ECB<PR-NCB. Coronal bending with the PTP positioner created greater accessibility than that achieved by lateral decubitus breaking (PR-NCB>LD, P = 0.0480). Coronal angulations were greatest in LD, and statistically different from both prone neutral (LD>PR-NN, P < 0.0001) and prone coronally bent (LD>PR-NCB, P < 0.0001). Lordosis was greatest in extended prone positions and lowest in lateral decubitus: PR-EN>PR-ECB>PR-NCB<>PR-NN>LD. All prone positions showed significantly greater lordosis than lateral decubitus (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with lateral decubitus, prone positioning provides equivalent or better L4-L5 LIF access around the iliac crest when a positioner is used that enables coronal bending, and improved positional lordosis, which may facilitate segmental correction and achievement of surgical alignment goals.

摘要

背景

传统的侧方椎体间融合术(LIF)是在侧卧位于手术台上进行的,以改善 L4-L5 的入路。俯卧位经椎间孔椎体间融合术(PTP LIF)可能改善矢状面排列,并有利于单体位的环形手术;但可能需要对髂嵴进行操作以获得 L4-L5 的可及性。

方法

健康成年志愿者(n=41)在透视式手术台上以右侧侧卧位定位,就像准备手术一样,并在定制的 PTP 垫上的 Jackson 式手术架上以俯卧位定位。从获得的 5 个位置的透视片测量髂嵴距离 L5 上终板的距离,以及冠状面和矢状面排列:标准侧卧位(LD)、俯卧位-髋关节和脊柱中立位(PR-NN)、俯卧位-髋关节中立位和脊柱冠状弯曲位(PR-NCB)、俯卧位-髋关节伸展位和脊柱中立位(PR-EN)以及俯卧位-髋关节伸展位和脊柱冠状弯曲位(PR-ECB)。

结果

俯卧位中立位时 L4-L5 的可及性最低,所有增强的定位配置均有所改善:PR-NN<>PR-EN<LD<PR-ECB<PR-NCB。PTP 定位器的冠状弯曲比侧卧位破坏产生更大的可及性(PR-NCB>LD,P=0.0480)。LD 时的冠状角最大,与俯卧位中立位(LD>PR-NN,P<0.0001)和俯卧位冠状弯曲位(LD>PR-NCB,P<0.0001)有统计学差异。伸展位俯卧位的脊柱前凸最大,侧卧位最低:PR-EN>PR-ECB>PR-NCB<>PR-NN>LD。所有俯卧位的脊柱前凸均显著大于侧卧位(P<0.001)。

结论

与侧卧位相比,当使用可实现冠状弯曲和改善定位前凸的定位器时,俯卧位可提供同等或更好的 L4-L5 LIF 入路,以绕过髂嵴,改善体位前凸,从而有利于节段矫正和实现手术对齐目标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验