University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Center for Healthcare Outcomes & Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
J Surg Res. 2021 Jun;262:71-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.12.057. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
BACKGROUND: For average-risk women with unilateral breast cancer, contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) offers no survival benefit and contributes to increased costs and patient harm. Despite recommendations from professional societies against CPM, utilization of this service is increasing, partly due to patients' desire for breast symmetry when undergoing mastectomy. Most women with small tumors are candidates for breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and could avoid CPM. We describe CPM utilization in women with small, unilateral tumors, and identify determinants of possible overuse. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database, we identified women with unilateral, T1 breast cancer. We evaluated utilization of BCS, unilateral mastectomy, and CPM and assessed patient, tumor, and facility factors associated with CPM. RESULTS: Of 765,487 women with small, unilateral breast cancer, 69% underwent BCS and 31% chose mastectomy. Of 176,673 women ≥70 y, 75% underwent BCS and 25% chose mastectomy. CPM rates in both cohorts have increased since 2006. Decreased adjuvant radiotherapy in older women was associated with increased BCS rates. Patient factors (younger age, white race, private insurance, and breast reconstruction), tumor factors (lobular histology, higher grade, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive/estrogen receptor negative status), and facility factors (type and geographic location) were associated with increased CPM rates compared with unilateral mastectomy in multivariable models. CONCLUSIONS: Most women with small unilateral breast cancer are candidates for BCS, yet one-third elects to undergo a mastectomy, of which a rising percentage opts for CPM. Tailoring deimplementation strategies to factors influencing treatment may help reduce CPM utilization and associated financial toxicity, pain, and disability.
背景:对于单侧乳腺癌的一般风险女性,对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM)不能带来生存获益,反而增加了成本和患者的伤害。尽管专业协会反对 CPM,但该服务的利用率仍在增加,部分原因是患者在接受乳房切除术时希望乳房对称。大多数小肿瘤患者都有机会进行保乳手术(BCS),从而可以避免 CPM。我们描述了小的单侧肿瘤患者中 CPM 的使用情况,并确定了过度使用的可能决定因素。
方法:我们使用国家癌症数据库,确定了单侧 T1 乳腺癌的女性患者。我们评估了 BCS、单侧乳房切除术和 CPM 的使用情况,并评估了与 CPM 相关的患者、肿瘤和医疗机构因素。
结果:在 765487 名患有小的单侧乳腺癌的女性中,69%接受了 BCS,31%选择了乳房切除术。在≥70 岁的 176673 名女性中,75%接受了 BCS,25%选择了乳房切除术。自 2006 年以来,两个队列的 CPM 率都有所增加。老年女性辅助放疗的减少与 BCS 率的增加有关。患者因素(年龄较小、白人、私人保险和乳房重建)、肿瘤因素(小叶组织学、更高的分级和人表皮生长因子受体 2 阳性/雌激素受体阴性状态)和医疗机构因素(类型和地理位置)与多变量模型中的单侧乳房切除术相比,与 CPM 率的增加相关。
结论:大多数患有小的单侧乳腺癌的女性都有机会进行 BCS,但其中三分之一选择进行乳房切除术,其中越来越多的人选择 CPM。针对影响治疗的因素制定消除策略可能有助于减少 CPM 的使用及其相关的经济毒性、疼痛和残疾。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019-5-28
CA Cancer J Clin. 2025
Surg Open Sci. 2024-2-23
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023-10
Cancer Causes Control. 2023-12
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022-12-12
J Oncol Pract. 2019-7-29
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019-5-28
N Engl J Med. 2017-9-28
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017-5