• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农村环境和交通距离对单侧乳腺癌患者行预防性对侧乳房切除术的影响。

Effect of rurality and travel distance on contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Dec;34(Suppl 1):171-186. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01689-9. Epub 2023 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1007/s10552-023-01689-9
PMID:37095280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10689552/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Despite lack of survival benefit, demand for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) to treat unilateral breast cancer remains high. High uptake of CPM has been demonstrated in Midwestern rural women. Greater travel distance for surgical treatment is associated with CPM. Our objective was to examine the relationship between rurality and travel distance to surgery with CPM.

METHODS

Women diagnosed with stages I-III unilateral breast cancer between 2007 and 2017 were identified using the National Cancer Database. Logistic regression was used to model likelihood of CPM based on rurality, proximity to metropolitan centers, and travel distance. A multinomial logistic regression model compared factors associated with CPM with reconstruction versus other surgical options.

RESULTS

Both rurality (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.06-1.15 for non-metro/rural vs. metro) and travel distance (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.33-1.41 for those who traveled 50 + miles vs. < 30 miles) were independently associated with CPM. For women who traveled 30 + miles, odds of receiving CPM were highest for non-metro/rural women (OR 1.33 for 30-49 miles, OR 1.57 for 50 + miles; reference: metro women traveling < 30 miles). Non-metro/rural women who received reconstruction were more likely to undergo CPM regardless of travel distance (ORs 1.11-1.21). Both metro and metro-adjacent women who received reconstruction were more likely to undergo CPM only if they traveled 30 + miles (ORs 1.24-1.30).

CONCLUSION

The impact of travel distance on likelihood of CPM varies by patient rurality and receipt of reconstruction. Further research is needed to understand how patient residence, travel burden, and geographic access to comprehensive cancer care services, including reconstruction, influence patient decisions regarding surgery.

摘要

目的

尽管没有生存获益,但是对于单侧乳腺癌治疗的对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM)的需求仍然很高。在中西部农村妇女中,CPM 的接受率很高。接受 CPM 手术的患者往往需要长途跋涉。我们的目的是研究农村性和手术治疗距离与 CPM 之间的关系。

方法

利用国家癌症数据库,确定了 2007 年至 2017 年间诊断为 I-III 期单侧乳腺癌的女性。采用逻辑回归模型,根据农村性、靠近大都市中心和旅行距离,对 CPM 的可能性进行建模。采用多项逻辑回归模型比较了与 CPM 相关的因素与重建与其他手术选择之间的关系。

结果

农村性(非大都市/农村地区的比值比[OR]为 1.10,95%可信区间[CI]为 1.06-1.15)和旅行距离(旅行 50 英里以上的 OR 为 1.37,95%CI 为 1.33-1.41)与 CPM 独立相关。对于旅行 30 英里以上的女性,CPM 接受率最高的是非大都市/农村地区的女性(旅行 30-49 英里的 OR 为 1.33,旅行 50 英里以上的 OR 为 1.57;参考:大都市女性旅行<30 英里)。无论旅行距离如何,非大都市/农村地区接受重建的女性接受 CPM 的可能性更高(OR 1.11-1.21)。只有在旅行 30 英里以上的情况下,大都市和大都市周边接受重建的女性才更有可能接受 CPM(OR 1.24-1.30)。

结论

旅行距离对 CPM 可能性的影响因患者的农村性和接受重建的情况而异。需要进一步研究以了解患者居住地、旅行负担以及获得全面癌症治疗服务(包括重建)的地理机会如何影响患者对手术的决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46da/10689552/bd6c2f1d7f1c/10552_2023_1689_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46da/10689552/24a273b7cb66/10552_2023_1689_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46da/10689552/d68e0deca419/10552_2023_1689_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46da/10689552/72e4213c6481/10552_2023_1689_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46da/10689552/bd6c2f1d7f1c/10552_2023_1689_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46da/10689552/24a273b7cb66/10552_2023_1689_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46da/10689552/d68e0deca419/10552_2023_1689_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46da/10689552/72e4213c6481/10552_2023_1689_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46da/10689552/bd6c2f1d7f1c/10552_2023_1689_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of rurality and travel distance on contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer.农村环境和交通距离对单侧乳腺癌患者行预防性对侧乳房切除术的影响。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Dec;34(Suppl 1):171-186. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01689-9. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
2
Impact of age, rurality and distance in predicting contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer in a Midwestern state: a population-based study.年龄、农村地区和距离对中西部地区乳腺癌预防性对侧乳房切除术的预测影响:一项基于人群的研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jul;188(1):191-202. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06105-x. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
3
Influence of Distance to Hospital and Insurance Status on the Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy, a National Cancer Data Base study.基于国家癌症数据库的研究:医院距离和保险状况对预防性对侧乳房切除术比率的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Oct;24(10):3038-3047. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5985-1. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
4
Trends in Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Utilization for Small Unilateral Breast Cancer.单侧乳腺癌小肿瘤保乳术后对侧预防性乳房切除术的应用趋势。
J Surg Res. 2021 Jun;262:71-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.12.057. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
5
Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Decisions in a Population-Based Sample of Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer.早期乳腺癌患者基于人群样本的对侧预防性乳房切除术决策
JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):274-282. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4749.
6
Assessing the Effect of Lifetime Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk on the Selection of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy for Unilateral Breast Cancer.评估终生对侧乳腺癌风险对单侧乳腺癌患者选择对侧预防性乳房切除术的影响。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2018 Apr;18(2):e205-e218. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
7
Second primary breast cancer after unilateral mastectomy alone or with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.单侧乳房切除术或对侧预防性乳房切除术治疗后的第二原发乳腺癌。
Cancer Med. 2020 Nov;9(21):8043-8052. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3394. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Social and Clinical Determinants of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy.对侧预防性乳房切除术的社会和临床决定因素
JAMA Surg. 2014 Jun;149(6):582-9. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5689.
9
Growing Use of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Despite no Improvement in Long-term Survival for Invasive Breast Cancer.对侧预防性乳房切除术的使用日益增加,尽管对浸润性乳腺癌的长期生存并无改善。
Ann Surg. 2017 Mar;265(3):581-589. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001698.
10
Trend and survival benefit of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among men with stage I-III unilateral breast cancer in the USA, 1998-2016.美国 1998-2016 年 I-III 期单侧乳腺癌男性患者行对侧预防性乳房切除术的趋势和生存获益。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Dec;190(3):503-515. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06397-z. Epub 2021 Sep 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of distance to diagnosis and area-based social measures with stage at diagnosis among Iowans with HPV-related cancers.爱荷华州人患人乳头瘤病毒相关癌症的诊断距离和基于区域的社会指标与诊断时分期的关联。
Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Sep 10. doi: 10.1007/s10552-025-02066-4.
2
Assessment of Differences in Colorectal Cancer Outcomes by Geographic Region for Black Patients in the United States.美国黑人患者结直肠癌结局的地理区域差异评估
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02455-0.
3
Geographic distance to Commission on Cancer-accredited and nonaccredited hospitals in the United States.

本文引用的文献

1
Definition and categorization of rural and assessment of realized access to care.农村的定义与分类以及对实际获得医疗服务情况的评估。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun;57(3):693-702. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13951. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
2
A qualitative study on the impact of long-distance travel for gynecologic cancer care.一项关于长途旅行对妇科癌症治疗影响的定性研究。
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2021 Sep 25;38:100868. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2021.100868. eCollection 2021 Nov.
3
Surgical Decision-Making Surrounding Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: Comparison of Treatment Goals, Preferences, and Psychosocial Outcomes from a Multicenter Survey of Breast Cancer Patients.
美国距离癌症委员会认证和未认证医院的地理距离。
J Rural Health. 2025 Jan;41(1):e12862. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12862. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
围绕着对侧预防性乳房切除术的手术决策:一项对乳腺癌患者进行的多中心调查的治疗目标、偏好和心理社会结果比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):8752-8765. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10426-y. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
4
Impact of age, rurality and distance in predicting contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer in a Midwestern state: a population-based study.年龄、农村地区和距离对中西部地区乳腺癌预防性对侧乳房切除术的预测影响:一项基于人群的研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jul;188(1):191-202. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06105-x. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
5
Trends in Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Utilization for Small Unilateral Breast Cancer.单侧乳腺癌小肿瘤保乳术后对侧预防性乳房切除术的应用趋势。
J Surg Res. 2021 Jun;262:71-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.12.057. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
6
Modern surgical treatment of breast cancer.乳腺癌的现代外科治疗
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Jun 23;56:95-107. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.06.016. eCollection 2020 Aug.
7
Breast Cancer Presentation, Surgical Management and Mortality Across the Rural-Urban Continuum in the National Cancer Database.基于国家癌症数据库的农村-城市连续体中乳腺癌表现、外科治疗和死亡率。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Jun;27(6):1805-1815. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08376-y. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
8
Differences in physician opinions about controversial issues surrounding contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM): A survey of physicians from accredited breast centers in the United States.关于对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM)相关争议问题的医生意见差异:对美国认可的乳腺中心医生的一项调查。
Cancer Med. 2020 May;9(9):3088-3096. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2914. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
9
Socioeconomic Factors Associated with the Receipt of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Women with Breast Cancer.与乳腺癌女性接受对侧预防性乳房切除术相关的社会经济因素。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Feb;29(2):220-229. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7350. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
10
B-Sure: a randomized pilot trial of an interactive web-based decision support aid versus usual care in average-risk breast cancer patients considering contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.B-Sure:一项随机试点试验,比较交互式网络决策支持辅助工具与常规护理在考虑对侧预防性乳房切除术的平均风险乳腺癌患者中的应用。
Transl Behav Med. 2020 May 20;10(2):355-363. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby133.