Centre for Research on Ageing, Health and Wellbeing, Australian National University, Building 54, Mills Road, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.
Centre for Research on Ageing, Health and Wellbeing, Australian National University, Building 54, Mills Road, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.
Psychiatry Res. 2021 Apr;298:113760. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113760. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
We explored latent psychiatric symptom profiles associated with methamphetamine use, and examined how these corresponded to diagnoses of schizophrenia (SZ) and methamphetamine-associated psychosis (MAP). We assessed psychiatric symptoms among 160 people who had used methamphetamine in the past month. Psychiatric symptoms were defined as a score of 4+ on Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) items. Diagnoses were made using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Participants were defined as having MAP if they met symptom criteria for SZ, but symptoms were considered to be always the result of substance use. Latent class analysis identified three classes. Class one (44% of participants) had a low probability of most BPRS symptoms; 4% met criteria for SZ, 51% for MAP. Class two (31% of participants) had a higher probability hallucinations and suspiciousness (37-46%); 72% met criteria for MAP, and 7% for SZ. Class three (25% of participants) had the highest probability for all positive psychotic symptoms (hallucinations, suspiciousness, grandiosity, unusual thought content; 32-82%), and reported activation, conceptual disorganisation, and tension (35% met criteria for SZ and 17% for MAP). We found three distinct classes of psychiatric symptom profiles, two of which showed partial alignment with diagnostic constructs of SZ and MAP.
我们探讨了与甲基苯丙胺使用相关的潜在精神症状特征,并研究了这些特征与精神分裂症(SZ)和甲基苯丙胺相关精神病(MAP)的诊断之间的对应关系。我们评估了过去一个月内使用过甲基苯丙胺的 160 人的精神症状。精神症状定义为简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)项目得分为 4+。诊断使用复合国际诊断访谈(CIDI)进行。如果符合 SZ 的症状标准,但症状被认为总是由物质使用引起的,则将参与者定义为 MAP。潜在类别分析确定了三个类别。第一类(44%的参与者)大多数 BPRS 症状的可能性较低;4%符合 SZ 标准,51%符合 MAP 标准。第二类(31%的参与者)出现幻觉和可疑症状的可能性较高(37-46%);72%符合 MAP 标准,7%符合 SZ 标准。第三类(25%的参与者)所有阳性精神病症状(幻觉、可疑、夸大、异常思维内容;32-82%)的可能性最高,并报告激活、概念混乱和紧张(35%符合 SZ 标准,17%符合 MAP 标准)。我们发现了三种不同的精神症状特征类别,其中两种与 SZ 和 MAP 的诊断结构部分一致。