Abecassis Isaac Josh, Zeeshan Qazi, Feroze Abdullah H, Ene Chibawanye, Vellimana Ananth K, Sekhar Laligam N
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Oper Neurosurg. 2021 May 13;20(6):E436. doi: 10.1093/ons/opab005.
Basilar tip aneurysm clipping is technically challenging because of the depth of operative corridor, rarity in presentation, and important perforators supplying deep, critical structures. Two major approaches to basilar tip aneurysms include (1) a frontotemporal (transorbital) trans-sylvian approach for most aneurysms and (2) a modified subtemporal approach for aneurysms with low-lying necks. A 53-yr-old woman presented to our institution with a large unruptured basilar tip aneurysm notable for a low, broad neck (6.4 mm). After discussion of risks and benefits of endovascular vs surgical options, the patient consented to operative intervention. She underwent a right frontotemporal craniotomy with zygomatic osteotomy, intradural petrous apicectomy, elective sectioning of the fourth cranial nerve (CN IV), and intracavernous removal of the dorsum sellae and posterior clinoid process to provide more space for aneurysm dissection. After temporary clipping of the basilar artery, the perforating arteries were dissected free from the aneurysm and the aneurysm occluded with 2 fenestrated clips. Important technical nuances of the approach include (1) achieving ample working room for temporary occlusion aneurysm dissection, (2) careful dissection of the perforators and contralateral P1, and (3) utilization of 2 fenestrated clips to accommodate and preserve the ipsilateral P1 segment. Postoperative angiogram showed complete aneur-ysmal occlusion. Postoperatively, the patient demonstrated mild cognitive impairment and a right CN IV palsy. At 6-wk follow-up, cognition recovered to normalcy. More recently, at 12-mo follow-up, the patient noted intermittent diplopia. Formal neuro-ophthalmologic assessment confirmed persistence of a CN IV palsy treated with prism lenses but no other neurological deficits.
基底动脉尖部动脉瘤夹闭术在技术上具有挑战性,这是由于手术通道较深、临床表现罕见,以及有重要的穿支动脉供应深部关键结构。基底动脉尖部动脉瘤的两种主要手术入路包括:(1)对于大多数动脉瘤采用额颞(经眶)经侧裂入路;(2)对于瘤颈位置较低的动脉瘤采用改良颞下入路。一名53岁女性因巨大未破裂基底动脉尖部动脉瘤就诊于我院,其瘤颈低且宽(6.4mm)。在讨论了血管内治疗与手术治疗的风险和益处后,患者同意接受手术干预。她接受了右侧额颞开颅术,包括颧骨截骨、硬膜内岩尖切除术、选择性切断第四脑神经(CN IV),以及海绵窦内切除鞍背和后床突,以提供更多空间进行动脉瘤分离。在临时夹闭基底动脉后,将穿支动脉从动脉瘤上分离出来,并用2个带孔夹闭动脉瘤。该手术入路的重要技术细节包括:(1)为临时夹闭动脉瘤分离获得足够的操作空间;(2)仔细分离穿支动脉和对侧P1段;(3)使用2个带孔夹以容纳和保留同侧P1段。术后血管造影显示动脉瘤完全闭塞。术后,患者出现轻度认知障碍和右侧CN IV麻痹。在6周随访时,认知恢复正常。最近,在12个月随访时,患者诉间歇性复视。正式的神经眼科评估证实存在用棱镜镜片治疗的CN IV麻痹,但无其他神经功能缺损。