Suppr超能文献

与罗哌卡因持续硬膜外输注相比,程序化间歇性硬膜外推注用于分娩镇痛的效果:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析

The effect of programmed intermittent epidural bolus compared with continuous epidural infusion in labor analgesia with ropivacaine: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Huang Rui, Zhu Jiang, Zhao Zizuo, Wang Bin

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Mar;10(3):2408-2420. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-1541. Epub 2021 Feb 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) as a new technique for labor analgesia has aroused extensive attention. The character of separation of the motor block to sensory block makes ropivacaine becoming an important local anesthetic for labor analgesia. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the efficiency and safety of PIEB regime compared to continuous epidural infusion (CEI) regime on labor analgesia with ropivacaine following the evidence emerged newly.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library were searched for potential articles. Eligible studies should meet these criterions: (I) healthy women; (II) it should compare PIEB and CEI; (III) ropivacaine should be use as local anesthetic for the maintenance of analgesia; (IV) the study should report the any of the outcomes we need. Maternal satisfaction, consumption of ropivacaine and duration of labor as well as the adverse effect were used to measure the efficacy and safety of those two regimes. Mean difference (MD), relative risk (RR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to present the final results.

RESULTS

Ten articles of randomized controlled trials and 3,790 subjects were eventually included in study. The pooled results showed that PIEB with ropivacaine significantly improved satisfaction (MD, 7.87; 95% CI: 6.02 to 9.72; I2 =0%; P<0.001), reduced the local anesthetic (milligram) in total (MD, -10.37 milligrams; 95% CI: -17.70 to -3.03; I2 =94%; P<0.001) and hourly (MD, -1.80 milligrams; 95% CI: -2.62 to -0.98; I 2 =56%; P<0.001). PIEB shortened the second stage of labor but has similar total duration of labor and it also decrease the incidence of motor block compare to CEI. There were no differences in mode of delivery and rescue bolus between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that PIEB regime was associated with higher satisfaction, lower consumption of ropivacaine in hours and totally, and shorter duration of second stage of labor compared to CEI in analgesia with ropivacaine during childbirth. PIEB regime has greater safety on fetus and maternity than CEI regime and it decreased the incidence of motor block without increasing other side effects compared to CEI.

摘要

背景

程序化间歇性硬膜外推注(PIEB)作为一种新的分娩镇痛技术已引起广泛关注。运动阻滞与感觉阻滞分离的特点使罗哌卡因成为分娩镇痛的重要局部麻醉药。在这项荟萃分析中,我们旨在根据最新出现的证据,评估与持续硬膜外输注(CEI)方案相比,PIEB方案在罗哌卡因分娩镇痛中的有效性和安全性。

方法

检索PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆以查找潜在文章。符合条件的研究应满足以下标准:(I)健康女性;(II)应比较PIEB和CEI;(III)罗哌卡因应用作维持镇痛的局部麻醉药;(IV)研究应报告我们所需的任何结果。产妇满意度、罗哌卡因消耗量、产程以及不良反应用于衡量这两种方案的有效性和安全性。最终结果采用均差(MD)、相对危险度(RR)、95%置信区间(CI)表示。

结果

最终纳入10篇随机对照试验文章和3790名受试者。汇总结果显示,罗哌卡因PIEB显著提高了满意度(MD,7.87;95%CI:6.02至9.72;I² =0%;P<0.001),减少了总局部麻醉药(毫克)用量(MD,-10.37毫克;95%CI:-17.70至-3.03;I² =94%;P<0.001)和每小时用量(MD,-1.80毫克;95%CI:-2.62至-0.98;I² =56%;P<0.001)。PIEB缩短了第二产程,但总产程相似,且与CEI相比,运动阻滞发生率也降低。两组在分娩方式和补救推注方面无差异。

结论

本研究表明,在分娩时罗哌卡因镇痛中,与CEI相比,PIEB方案具有更高的满意度、更低的罗哌卡因每小时和总消耗量以及更短的第二产程。PIEB方案对胎儿和产妇的安全性高于CEI方案,且与CEI相比,在不增加其他副作用的情况下降低了运动阻滞的发生率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验