Suppr超能文献

免疫检查点抑制剂联合化疗作为一线治疗非鳞状非小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析和间接比较。

Efficacy and safety of first-line treatments with immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy for non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis and indirect comparison.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Mar;10(3):2766-2775. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-1498. Epub 2021 Feb 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recently, several clinical studies have evaluated the first-line use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with platinum-doublet chemotherapy in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), however, the differences in safety and efficacy between the various types of ICIs still require investigation. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the first-line use of ICIs combined with platinum-doublet chemotherapy in patients with non-squamous NSCLC by meta-analysis and indirect comparison.

METHODS

Literature searches were performed using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database, and Wanfang Data to identify all relevant randomized clinical trials for non-squamous NSCLC after 2010. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse effects (AEs) were pooled for meta-analysis and indirect comparison. Subgroup analyses were conducted to examine the factors associated with PFS.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis showed that the additional use of ICIs could significantly improve PFS and OS. The indirect comparison showed no significant difference in pembrolizumab + chemotherapy and atezolizumab + chemotherapy in the reducing of disease progression, while a significant difference in restricted mean survival time (RMST) was found between pembrolizumab + chemotherapy compared with atezolizumab + chemotherapy. A significant increase in grade ≥3 AEs was observed with the additional use of atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy. Subgroups including PD-1 status [high (>50%), intermediate (1-49%), and negative (<1%) expression], sex (male and female), smoking status (current or former smoker, and never smoked), liver metastases (with and without), age (>65 and ≤65) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score (ECOG=0 and ECOG=1) were all associated with better PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis confirmed the treatment effects of ICIs combined with chemotherapy for non-squamous NSCLC. The pembrolizumab combination group had a greater RMST benefit compared with the atezolizumab combination group. Furthermore, our study also demonstrated a PFS advantage for non-squamous NSCLC using ICIs combined with chemotherapy irrespective of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level, smoking status, liver metastasis status, sex, age and ECOG score. Due to the significant increase in AEs (> grade 3), more attention should be paid to the additional use of atezolizumab.

摘要

背景

最近,几项临床研究评估了免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)联合铂类双药化疗在非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中的一线应用,然而,不同 ICI 的安全性和疗效差异仍需研究。本研究通过荟萃分析和间接比较评估了 ICI 联合铂类双药化疗在非鳞状 NSCLC 患者中的一线应用的疗效和安全性。

方法

检索 2010 年后发表的所有关于非鳞状 NSCLC 的相关随机临床试验,检索数据库包括 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、Embase、中国知识资源综合数据库和万方数据。对总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和不良事件(AEs)进行荟萃分析和间接比较。进行亚组分析以探讨与 PFS 相关的因素。

结果

荟萃分析表明,ICI 的额外使用可显著改善 PFS 和 OS。间接比较显示,在减少疾病进展方面,pembrolizumab + 化疗和 atezolizumab + 化疗之间没有显著差异,而 pembrolizumab + 化疗与 atezolizumab + 化疗之间的限制性平均生存时间(RMST)存在显著差异。与化疗联合使用 atezolizumab 会显著增加 3 级及以上 AEs。包括 PD-1 状态[高(>50%)、中(1-49%)和低(<1%)表达]、性别(男、女)、吸烟状态(当前或既往吸烟者、从不吸烟者)、肝转移(有、无)、年龄(>65 岁和≤65 岁)和东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)评分(ECOG=0 和 ECOG=1)在内的亚组均与更好的 PFS 相关。

结论

本荟萃分析证实了 ICI 联合化疗治疗非鳞状 NSCLC 的疗效。pembrolizumab 联合组与 atezolizumab 联合组相比,RMST 获益更大。此外,我们的研究还表明,ICI 联合化疗在非鳞状 NSCLC 患者中具有 PFS 优势,与 PD-L1 表达水平、吸烟状态、肝转移状态、性别、年龄和 ECOG 评分无关。由于 AEs(>3 级)显著增加,应更加关注 atezolizumab 的额外使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验